www.whatisindia.com

What Is India News Service
Thursday, July 24, 2014


The Indian Analyst


 

South Indian Inscriptions


 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume I

Volume II

Volume III

Vol. IV - VIII

Volume IX

Volume X

Volume XI

Volume XII

Volume XIII

Volume XIV

Volume XV

Volume XVI

Volume XVII

Volume XVIII

Volume XIX

Volume XX

Volume XXII_Part I

Volume XXII_Part II

Tanjavur

Tiruvarur

Volume XXIII

Volume XXIV

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

EPIGRAPHICAL NOTES

THE LATE RAO BAHADUR C. R. KRISHNAMACHARLU, MADRAS

KOROSHANDA PLATES OF VISAKHAVARMAN

Mr. G. Ramadas has published an article on the above plates.5 He does not notice the name of the executor of the grant in his introductory remarks. The published text (l.8) gives the name as follows : Ājñābhōgikabōdudēvaḥ. The index to the volume in question gives the article ājñābhōgika in the sense of an official and his name as Bōdudēva. There are one or two serious objections to this rendering of the original. If ājñābhōgika is presumed to be an official, the expression as read in the text would carry no sense. It does not either form a sentence or signify a statement by itself. Moreover the official ājñābhōgika is not known from any other record. But the official Bhōgika figures in several documents like Amātya.6 It would, therefore, be more correct

_________________________

[1] Read pradatta uda-
[2] Read asmad-dāyō=yam=anu-
[3] Read rājabhiḥ.
[4] [The ornamental treatment of the stroke indicating the vowellessness of the letter t is worthy of note. In vasēt, l. 25, and in dadyāt, l. 27, it seems to be mixed up with the mark of punctuation.─Ed.]
[5] Above, Vol. XXI, p. 23.
[6] D. R. Bhandarkar. List of Inscriptions of Northern India, Nos. 1194, 1195, 1196, 1205, etc.

Home Page


Archives | Links | Search
About Us | Feedback | Guestbook

2006 Copyright What Is India Publishers (P) Ltd. All Rights Reserved.