The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

A NOTE ON THE NALAJANAMPADU INSCRIPTION

N. LAKSHMINARAYAN RAO, OOTACAMUND

In his article on this inscription Mr. Alfred Master attributes the record, which the places in the 7th-8th century of the Christian era on grounds of palæography and language, to the Pallava king Paramēśvara I. His main argument for doing so is that the expression Paramēśvara occurring in line 5 of the record is a personal name and not a biruda of Bādirāja (l.7) as has been hitherto supposed ; for, according to him, it is not likely that a subordinate chief of Pallava descent could have used the biruda as the earlier Pallavas used the word only as a personal name and the later members of the family had no need to assume it. Moreover this title which was adopted by the Chālukyas and occasionally used by the Rāhsṭrakūṭas was not used by the Bāṇas, the Gaṅgas or the Chōḷas. But I may point out that there is at least one inscription at Kāñchīpuram which indicates that the early Pallava king Narasiṁhavishṇu had the title of Paramēśvara.[3] In the context it is not possible to take the word used in double entendre as the proper name of the

_______________________________

[1] Above, Vol. XI, pp. 224 and 225.
[2] In the preparation of this paper, I have profited by some useful suggestions kindly put forward by Dr. L. D. Barnett. I also owe thanks to Mr. C. S. K. Pathy, D-ēs-L for his perusal of the rough draft.
[3] S. I. I., Vol. I, No. 29.
Bharttuḥ Pur-ōnmathana-dṛishṭa-dhanur-bbalasya
Śailādhirājatanay=ēva Vṛishadhvajasya [|*]
yā Kālakāla iti viśruta-puṇya-kīrttēḥ
kāntā nitānta-dayitā Paramēśvarasyaḥ(sya)||[1*]
Dēvē jagad-valaya-rakshaṇa-baddha-dīkshē
nirhhinna-śatru-hṛidayē Narasiṁhavishṇau [|*]
vāllabhyam=ūrjjitam=avāpya virājatē yā
nirjjitya garvvam=iva Pushkaradēvatāyāḥ ||[2*]
As Narasiṁhavishṇu was the name of the king, the expressions Kālakāla and Paramēśvara are to be taken as his birudas.

Home Page