The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

P. Acharya

A. M. Annigeri

P. Banerjee

Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

P. D. Chaudhury

M. G. Dikshit

M. G. Dikshit & D. C. Sircar

A. S. Gadre

B. C. Jain

S. L. Katare

B. V. Krishna Rao

A. N. Lahiri

T. V. Mahalingam

R. C. Majumdar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

V. Rangacharya

Sadasiva Ratha Sarma

Nirad Bandhu Sanyal

M. Somasekhara Sarma

K. N. Sastri

D. C. Sircar

D. C. Sircar & P. Acharya

D. C. Sircar & P. D. Chaudhury

D. C. Sircar & Sadasiva Ratha Sarma

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N.Subramaniam

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

No. 10─ UMACHAL ROCK INSCRIPTION OF SURENDRAVARMAN

(1Plate)

D. C. SIRCAR, OOTACAMUND, AND P. D. CHAUDHURY, GAUHATI

One day about the middle of the year 1955, Mr. R. M. Nath, wellknown for his enthusiasm in the discovery and study of antiquities in Assam, when he was Principal of the Assam Civil Engineering Institute at Gauhati, went to see Swami Sivanandaji of the Umāchala Āśrama on the north-eastern slope of the Kāmākhyā or Nīlāchal hill near Gauhati. This part of the hill is known as the Umāchal hill. The Swamiji informed Mr. Nath that, due to the uprooting of a very old banyan tree several years back, a huge rock bearing an inscription in very bold characters had been exposed to view near his Āśrama. The information excited the curiosity of Mr. Nath who at once examined the inscription which was found to be in a perfectly satisfactory state of preservation. The rock bearing the inscription was found to measure about 10 feet in height and 12 feet in breadth and to lie about 300 feet above the level of the river Brahmaputra. Next day Mr. Nath again visited the Umāchala Āśrama and took photographs of the epigraph as well as its impressions on blotting paper. A gentleman named L. N. Das took considerable interest in the work. The impressions and photographs of the inscription were shown to the officers of the Assam State Museum, Gauhati. Latter a photograph and an impression of the inscription were also sent for examination to the Government Epigraphist for India. The world of scholars is thankful to Swami Sivananda, Mr. R. M. Nath and Mr. L. N. Das for the discovery of this interesting epigraph.

The inscription consists of four lines of writing and covers a space measuring 12″ to 15″ by 10″ to 11″. The first line is 12″ in length and the last 15″. The characters belong to the Eastern variety of the Gupta Alphabet assignable to a period between the fourth and the sixth century A.D. The letter m, l, s and h are of the Eastern Gupta type. On palaeographical grounds, the inscription may be assigned to a date near about that of the Barganga inscription[1] of Bhūtivarman (circa 518-42 A.D.), with which it has very close resemblance in respect both of palaeography and style. The form of the letter y in the passage āyushkāmaṁ vishay-āº in line 3 of the Barganga inscription, however, seems to be later than that of the same letter in ºsvāmināya in line 4 of our record. Interesting from the palaeographical point of view is the representation of the mute m in kṛitam in line 2 and of b by the sign for v in Valabhadra (line 3). The language of the inscription is Sanskṛit. There is a grammatical error in the passage bhagavataḥ Balabhadrasvāmināya in lines 3-4, the intended reading apparently being either bhagavataḥ Balabhadrasvāminaḥ or bhagavatē Balabhadrasvāminē. It is clear that, for ºsvāmināya, Sanskrit ºsvāminē was the intended reading, although the word bhagavataḥ suggests that the scribe had originally ºsvāminaḥ in mind. Of orthographical interest are the retention of the mute m before bh in the passage kṛitam bhagavataḥ (lines 2-3), the avoidance of sandhi in the passage bhagavataḥ Balabhadraº (line 3) and the change of the final m into anusvāra in guhaṁ (line 4) which is the concluding word of the record. The use of the word guha in the neuter, probably in the sense of Sanskrit guhā, ‘ cave ‘, is of lexical intereset.[2]

The inscription was meant to serve the purpose of a label of an artificial cave (guhā) or cave-temple constructed by Mahārājādhirāja Surēndravarman for Bhagavat Balabhadrasvāmīn.

___________________________________________________

[1] Above, Vol. XXX, pp. 62 ff. and Plate.
[2] The word guha, as used in the epigraph, does not appear to be derived from Sanskrit gṛiha under the influence of local pronunciation.

Home Page