The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

Preface

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

Administration

Social History

Religious History

Literary History

Gupta Era

Krita Era

Texts and Translations

The Gupta Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

THE GUPTA SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION

department is Raṇabhāṇḍāgāṛādhikaraṇa which also is met with on a Basāḍh seal1 and which must signify “Office of Military Store House.” The sixth and the last term that we have to note is Sāndhivigrahika or Mahāsāndhivigrahika or Mahāsāndhivigrahādhikaraṇādhikṛita2 as he is also styled in some records. Here the word mahā seems to be an honorific prefix, as the first two we find used, e.g., in the charters of the Uchchakalpa family. Thus, in the Khoh plate dated 177, Gallu, the officer who drew up the charter, is called Sāndhivigrahika,3 whereas in the Khoh plate of 193, his brother, Manōratha, is styled Mahāsāndhivigrahika.4 Possibly, in later times there was a distinction made between Sāndhivigrahika and Mahāsāndhivigrahika. In the earlier Gupta period, however, Sāndhivigrahika seems to be the only designation known. Thus, Harishēṇa, who drew up the Allahābād pillar praśasti of Samudragupta, was not an ordinary officer. He was not only a Mahādaṇḍanāyaka, but also a Kumārāmātya. That is a clear indication of the high social and political status he was then enjoying. Nevertheless, the actual designation which he had held at that time was that of Sāndhivigrahika, without the prefix mahā. Of course, Sāndhivigrahika denoted ‘a Minister for Peace and War’, but whether he was a Minister of External Affairs as we understand him at present, it is difficult to say. As this officer must thus have been connected with correspondence with the foreign states, and was, at any rate, a commissioner properly authorised for such transactions as treaties of peace or of alliance, truces and so forth, he and the members of his office must therefore have been experts in the art of composition and mode of drafting. Thus, an Udayagiri inscription (No. 11 below) speaks of Vīrasēna Śāba of the Kautsa gōtra as being the Sāndhivigrahika of Chandragupta II and describes him as a kavi or poet. Nay, Harishēṇa himself who drew up the praśasti of samudragupta engraved upon the Allahābād pillar describes it as a kāvya; and elsewhere we have pointed out what a great master of style and composition he was, by discussing the literary merits of that panegyric.5 It is therefore no wonder if a Sāndhivigrahika or any one of his assistants or subordinates6 is generally7 found entrusted with the task of preparing the draft of a land grant.

>

       Another officer connected with daṇḍa is Dāṇḍapāśika mentioned in the legend Dāṇḍapāśikādhikaraṇasya on a Basāḍh seal noted above. In this connection we have to take note of the fact that Dāṇḍapāśika is distinguished from Chaurōddharaṇika not only in the later Pāla and Sēna charters but also in the earlier Valabhī8 and Chamba9 plates. Further, they are both distinguished from Dāṇḍika or Daṇḍaśakti in the Pāla plates. Thus the Khālimpur record of Dharmapāla has Daṇḍaśakti-Dāṇḍapāśika-Chaurōddharaṇika,10 whereas the Mungir inscription of Dēvapāla has Chaurōddharaṇika-Dāṇḍika-Dāṇḍapāśika.11 It seems that Dāṇḍika is the same as Daṇḍaśakti. Dāṇḍika is not an imaginary term, it occurs also in the Deo-Baraṇārk inscription12 of Jīvitagupta II. In thus settling the meaning of Dāṇḍapāśika, we have to consider side by side
______________________________________________________________

1 A.R. ASI., 1903-04, p. 108, No. 13.
2 Ep. Ind., Vol. VI, p. 299, line 34.
3 CII., Vol. III, 1888, p. 123, line 22.
4 Ibid., p. 128, lines 30-31.
5 See, pp. 149-63 below.
6 Thus we find a Kaṭak grant of Mahā-Bhavagupta I drafted by Māhūka, a Kāyastha, who belonged to the office of Rāṇa Malladatta, the Mahāsāndhivigrahin (Ep. Ind., Vol. III, p. 350, lines 46-48).
7 See e.g., a grant of Daṇḍimahādēvī which was drawn up by the poet Jambala, son of the great poet Jayātman who is mentioned separately from the Mahākshapaṭalika and the Mahāsāndhivigrahin and Mahāpratihāra (Ibid., Vol. VI, p. 139, lines 39-40).
8 Ind. Ant., Vol. V, p. 207, line 3; Vol. VII, p. 72, Plate II, line 2.
9 Vogel’s Chamba Vol., p. 166, line 9; p. 193, lines 14-15 etc.; also p. 129. Vogel wrongly reads Daṇḍavāśika instead of Daṇḍapāśika as Kielhorn correctly reads it (Ind. Ant., Vol. XVII, pp. 11-12, lines 14-15).
10 Ep. Ind., Vol. IV, p. 250, line 45.
11 Ind. Ant., Vol. XXI, p. 256, line 33.
12 CII., Vol. III, 1888, p. 216, line 9.

>
>