The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

Preface

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

Administration

Social History

Religious History

Literary History

Gupta Era

Krita Era

Texts and Translations

The Gupta Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

POLITICAL HISTORY

he had already attained to the rank of paramount sovereign. The Horse Sacrifice must have been celebrated very soon after the record was incised on the column, as the obvious culmination of his assertion of undisputed supremacy over the whole of India. This view is confirmed by a critical study of the coins he issued to signalise this event of extreme political importance. On the obverse of the coin, as Allan1 informs us, is a representation of the sacrificial steed standing before a decorated sacrificial post (yūpa) and apparently bound to it. On the reverse is a female figure standing, wearing loose robe and jewellery and holding chowrie over her right shoulder in her right hand. Presumably she is the mahishī or Chief Queen of Samudragupta, namely, Dattadēvī, who must have played a more important part in the sacrifice than the other wives of the king. On the left is a sacrificial spear bound with fillet. Around her feet is what looks like a chain extending also round the spear. At her feet, again, is an uncertain object which seems to be a gourd. On the reverse, again, is the legend Aśvamēdha-parākramaḥ, which is no doubt the appellation he assumed after the performance of the sacrifice and which signifies “one whose valour is Horse Sacrifice.” This means that when he performed Aśvamēdha, he exhibited valour, that, in other words, it was through his valour that he was able to celebrate the sacrifice. This Aśvamēdha of Samudragupta, therefore, must have been an achievement worthy of a Sārvabhauma. It could not have been performed with a purely secular motive, such, for example, as putra-prāpti, or a purely religious purpose, such as the expiation of sins. This is corroborated also by the distich which occurs on the reverse of his coins, namely, rājādhirājaḥ pṛithivīṁ vijitya divaṁ jayaty=Aprativārya-vīryaḥ, “The overlord of lords, having conquered the earth, being of irresistible prowess, conquers heaven”. This indicates that his conquests all over India have developed into Aśvamēdha which has now enabled him to conquer heaven also.

>

       It has been stated above that though the coins of Samudragupta commemorate his celebration of Horse Sacrifice, no reference to it is traceable in his epigraphic records. The inscriptions of his descendants, however, do refer to it. Thus the Bilsaḍ and Bihār stone pillar inscriptions of Kumāragupta and Budhagupta respectively (Nos. 16 and 41 below) speak of Samudragupta as chir-ōtsann-āśvamēdh-āharttā. This expression Fleet has rendered by “who was the restorer of the aśvamēdha-sacrifice, that had been long in abeyance.” When this English savant published his classical work Gupta Inscriptions, there was little epigraphical evidence to show that there was any other king except Sātakarṇi,2 or rather his queen, who performed the Horse Sacrifice before the time of the Gupta monarch. But their name is now legion. Because now we know that Aśvamēdha was performed twice by the Śuṅga Pushyamitra,3 once by Pārāśarīputra Gājāyana Sarvatāta,4 twice by Vēdiśrī Sātakarṇi,5 ten times by the Bhāraśivas,6 four times by the Vākāṭaka Pravarasēna I,7 and once by the Ikshvāku Vāsishṭhīputra Chāṁtamūla.8 Besides, we have the evidence of a seal that the same sacrifice was celebrated by Vishṇudēva9 about 150 B.C. If, therefore, Harishēṇa gives us to understand that Samudragupta restored Aśvamēdha which had for long been in abeyance, it is an exaggeration, pure and simple, of a court panegyrist. But does the phrase chir-ōtsann-āśvamēdh-āharttā necessarily mean this ? Is
__________________________________________________

1 Catalogue of the Coins of the Gupta Dynasty, Intro., p. lxxvii and f.; and p. 21.
2 ASWI., Vol. V, p. 60.
3 Ep. Ind., Vol. XX, p. 57. [Cf. also the brick inscription of Dāmamitra, Ibid., Vol. XXXIII, pp. 99-100.-Ed.]
4 Ind. Ant., Vol. LXI, p. 203; IHQ., Vol. IX, p. 795; Ep. Ind., Vol. XXII, pp. 203-04.
5 ASWI., Vol. V. p. 60, No. II.
6 CII., Vol. III, 1888, No. 55, p. 273, text lines 6-7 and No. 56, p. 245, text line 6.
7 Ibid., No. 55, p. 236, text line 2 and No. 56, p. 245, text line 2.
8 Ep. Ind., Vol. XX, pp. 18 ff. (Āyaka-pillar inscription B 2, line 1 ; C 2, line 3 ; C 4, line 3 ; E line 1 ; G lines 2-3 ; H lines 4-5) ; ibid., Vol. XXXV, pp. 18-19.
9 JRAS., 1893, p. 97.

>
>