The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

Preface

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

Administration

Social History

Religious History

Literary History

Gupta Era

Krita Era

Texts and Translations

The Gupta Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

SOCIAL HISTORY

demned in two of the Rāshṭrakūṭa records referred to above. It was, however, condemned not because of its being legally inadmissible.

       We shall now turn to the other aspects of the social life of the Gupta period, and consider, above all, the nature of the ethno-social fabric of this epoch. Years ago we had occasion to observe that there was a racial identity or rather affinity between the Kāyasthas of Bengal and the Nāgar Brāhmaṇas of Bombay Gujarāt.1 We were then engaged upon a study of this Brāhmaṇa community with the help of Valabhī inscriptions and certain Pravarādhyāya texts discovered by the late Vallabhji Haridatta Acharya of Rājkōṭ, the greatest Nāgar Brāhmaṇa archaeologist and historian of the last generation. The texts cite a verse setting forth Śarmans or clan affixes going with the various gōtras of the Nāgar Brāhmaṇas. The verse runs as follows:

..........................Datta-Guptau Nanda-Ghōshau
............................................Śarma-Dāsau cha Varma cha /
..........................Nāgadattas=Trāta-Bhūtau
...........................................Mitra-Dēvau Bhavas=tathā //

       The texts in question are three manuscripts of the work Pravarādhyāya connected with the Nāgars. One of these is dated Saṁvat 1788 Vaiśākha śuda 8 Bhṛigu. And they all distinctly and unmistakably state that the gōtras, pravaras, etc., therein specified are those which were in existence before Saṁvat 1283. The thirteen Śarmans set forth in the verse quoted above must therefore have been in use among the Nāgar Brāhmaṇas up till 700 years ago. Even now they are affixed to their names when they perform the religious ceremonies. Leaving aside the second statement for the time being, let us see whether the first one receives any corroboration from epigraphic sources. We will therefore confine ourselves here to two Śarmans only, namely, Mitra and Trāta. In the Pravarādhyāya, Mitra has been assigned two gōtras, namely, Śārkarāksha and Gāṅgyāyana. The following extracts from the copper-plate inscriptions of the Maitraka princes, all found at Alīnā, are worthy of consideration:

>

......(1) Ānarttapura-vinirggata-khēṭaka-nivāsi-Śārkkarākshi-sagōtra-bahvṛicha-sabrahmachāri-brāhmaṇ-Āḍhyamitra-putra-brāhmaṇa-Vishṇumitrāya2
......(2) Śrīmad-Ānandapura-vāstavya-tach-chāturvidya-sāmānya- Śarkkarākshi-sagōtra-bahvṛicha-sabrahmachāri-bhaṭṭ-Ākhaṇḍalamitrāya bhaṭṭa-Vishṇu-putrāya3
......(3) Ānarttapura-vinirggata-Kāsaragrāma-nivāsy-Ānarttapur-chāturvidya-sāmānya-Śarkkarākshi-sagōtra-bahvṛicha-sabrahmachāri-brāhmaṇa-Kēśavamitra-putra-brāhmaṇa-Nārāyaṇamitrāya4
......(4) Ānandapura-vinirggata-Khēṭaka-vāstavy-Ānandapura-chāturvidya-sāmānya-Śarkkarākshi-sagōtra-bahvṛicha-sabrahmachāri-brāhmaṇa-Kēśava-putra-brāhmaṇa-Nārāyaṇa5

       The above four plates were all found at Alīnā in the Kaira District of Gujarat State. They were issued by different Maitraka rulers of Valabhī to Brāhmaṇa grantees who were natives of Ānandapura or Ānarttapura. Both are names of Vaḍnagar to which pertained a branch of the Nāgar Brāhmaṇa community called Vaḍnagrā.6 There can thus be no doubt as to the grantees of these charters having been Nāgar Brāhmaṇas. This is proved further by the fact that they were all of the Śārkkarākshi gōtra, a gōtra which, the Nāgars maintain, is to be met with in no other caste than their own.7 Further still, it deserves to be noticed that the names of the donees and their fathers end in Mitra, so far as the first three inscriptions go. What could be
_______________________

1 Ind. Ant., Vol. XL, pp. 32 and ff.
2 Ibid. Ant., Vol. VII, p. 72, Pl. II, lines 4-5.
3 Ibid., p. 85, lines 26-27; CII., Vol. III, 1888, p. 179, lines 65-66.
4 Ind. Ant., Vol. VII, p. 75, Pl. II, lines 15-17.
5 Ibid., p. 79, Pl. II, lines 14-15.
6 B.G., Vol. I, pt. i, p. 6; Ep. Ind., Vol. I, pp. 295, 299 and 303.
7 Ibid., Vol. IX, pt. I, pp. 13-14.

>
>