The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

Preface

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

Administration

Social History

Religious History

Literary History

Gupta Era

Krita Era

Texts and Translations

The Gupta Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

THE GUPTA INSCRIPTIONS

NO. 40 : PLATE XL

DĀMŌDARPUR COPPER-PLATE INSCRIPTION OF BUDHAGUPTA

       This plate also was found in the village of Damodarpur in the same circumstances, as Nos. 22, 24 and 38, and is deposited along with them in the Museum of the Varendra Research Society, Rajshahi, now in Bangladesh. It was edited by Radhagovinda Basak in the Ep. Ind., Vol. XV, pp. 138 ff., and plate iv a and b.

>

        The plate is one in number, and is inscribed on both sides, the first containing twelve and second six lines of writing. It measures 71/8’"X4¼". The edges of it have uniformly even except along the rims for the protection of the writing. The plate as it is, is uniformly even except along the edge of its proper right side. The upper corner here has been cut away, the actual specification of the year of the date being destroyed therewith. As regards the second side of the plate it is so corroded that the writing on it has become almost illegible, though lines 15-18 can be read with pretty certainty by comparison with the corresponding matter on Nos. 38 and 47. The seal is practically of the same oval shape as that of the plate described in No. 47 below and was attached to the middle of the proper right side. It measures 1¾"X15/8”. It seems it once bore a legend upon it as in No. 47. But it is now completely effaced. The weight of the plate together with its seal is 27 1/8 tolas. The characters belong, generally speaking, to the eastern variety of the Gupta alphabet as remarked about the plate described in No. 22 above. The other palaeographic peculiarities are (1) the occurrence of the initial a in adhishṭhān-, line 3, anēna, line 5, and so on; (2) the initial ē in ēkādaśa, line 11; (3) the peculiar form of the medial ā, after th and dh as in yathākraya-, line 9 and =avadhāraṇay=ā°, line 10, and in grā as in Ḍāṅgā-grāmē, line 6, as remarked above in connection with No. 38; (4) the method of forming r in conjunction with the following y, e.g., in maryyāda° in lines 9 and 12; (5) the coupling of ending t and n with the immediately following consonants, e.g., tat-pāda-, line 2, =ētat-kōshṭhikā, line 8, asmat-phal-, line 6, =ahan=tat-kshēttra, line 7, and kulyavāpān=yathākraya-, line 9. The characters also include, in line 1, numerical symbols for 10 and 5 (?). The language is Sanskrit; and the inscription is in prose throughout, with the exception of the three imprecatory verses in lines 15-18. The only linguistic peculiarity that calls for notice is the use of the affix ka in some words, such as =ānuvahamānakē, lines 2-3; -niyuktaka and Āyuktaka-, line 3, atisṛishṭakās=, line 7 and dattakās= line 11. In respect of orthography, we have to note (1) the doubling of d, th and dh (by t and d as required by the rules), v and sh (wrongly) in conjunction with a preceding r as in -Sārtthavāha-, line 4, and =tad-artthañ=, line 11[saṁ]vyavahāribhir=ddēva-, line 15, Puṇḍravarddhana-, line 2, pūrvvaṁ-, line 6 and [Kō]ṭi[varshsha]-, line 3; (2) the doubling of t in conjunction with a following r, such e.g., as in –kshēttra-, lines 7, 11 and 12, -Vasumittra-, line 4; (3) the use of the dental nasal instead of anusvāra in combination with a following s, as e.g., in -phal-āśansinā, line 6; (4) the change of visarga to s in conjunction with that letter following it as e.g., in [pi]tṛi[bhis=saha], line 16; and (5) change of anusvāra to m with a following v, as e.g., in sa[mvya]vaharati, line 4.

       The inscription refers itself to the reign of Paramadaivata Paramabhaṭṭāraka Mahārājādhirāja Budhagupta, that is, Budhagupta of the Imperial Gupta dynasty. The date was in numerical symbols but unfortunately the ‘year’ part of the date has disappeared with the upper corner of the proper right side of the plate which is destroyed. The exact specification of the day also is not well preserved. The month mentioned has, however, been preserved, and it is Phālguna. Under Budhagupta was Mahārāja Jayadatta as Head (Uparika) of the Puṇḍravardhana province (bhukti); and in the Kōṭivarsha district (vishaya), under him, the Court (adhikaraṇa) of the Town (adhishṭhāna) was being carried on by the Āyuktaka Bhaṇḍaka,

>
>