The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

BAMHANI PLATES OF PANDAVA KING BHARATABALA ; YEAR 2

script of the latter record bears a striking resemblance to that of the present one. This is obviously to be accounted for by the comparative proximity between the two : they belong more or less to one and the same period and their findspots are far removed from each other.1 Prabhāvatiguptā’s charter is earlier than these two by about a century. Its character, though otherwise similar, appears sons what slanting as compared with that of the other two inscriptions, which is upright.

It must, however, be observed that the character of the present inscription, in spite of the similarities noticed differs greatly from that of the other two in one respect. To wit, it pertains, as has been stated above, to the Southern class of alphabets, while the script represented by the Majhgawāṁ plates belongs to the Northern class and that used in the Poona plates is found to be a mixture of both. In fact, an analysis of the script of the last-mentioned record has shown that ‘it is rather difficult to ascertain whether the northern or the southern characters predominate’[2]there. A comparative study, on the other hand, has revealed the character of the present record to be pre-eminently southern, as will presently be demonstrated.

>

As already remarked, the top of each letter in the script under discussion generally consists of a triangle or a nail-head. There are, however, certain exceptions to this rule. Among the initial vowels, of which the present inscription affords insurances of a (l. 37), ā (ll. 1, 38, 45), i (ll. 3, 16, 17, 33),u (l. 34), ē (ll. 25, 29) and au (l. 16), three, namely, i, ē, and au, are not provided with a nail-head.[3] Of the consonants, the following five are likewise without a nail-head : kh, j, ṇ, b and l. Possibly and ñ are also like that. The former may be seen used as the first member of a conjunct letter, ṅkṛi (l. 4), and the latter as the second in another, jña (l. 5). In the case of g. ṭ, th, dh, v and ś the triangle at the top has, as necessitated by the upper curve of the letters, become almost an oblong, whereas with m it is definitely a square or a box-head, a general characteristic of another variety of alphabets, mainly found in the Vākāṭaka inscriptions, which has on that account received the designation ‘box-headed’.

The most conspicuous of the test letters, stamping the character of the present inscription as pre-eminently southern, are the initial a, ā, ē and au as well as k, m, r and l. It may be pointed out that the Poona plates, in common with the present charter, have the southern a, k and r. Examples of initial au are extremely rare, but a comparison between its northern and southern forms has been rendered possible by the fact that they are found respectively in the Majhgawāṁ plates (l. 8) and in the present record (l. 16). The form found in the latter appears to be essentially the same as is met with in the Māṅgaḷūr grant of the Pallava Siṁhavarman.[4] A slight notch in the top stroke of the letter j, and the manner of expressing medial i by a circle and ī by a circle with a dot in its centre, as noticed in the present inscription, are further southern peculiarities.

_____________________


[1]The Nāgaudh and Rewa States, wherein the two places, namely Majhgawāṁ and Bamhanī, are respectively included, are adjoining each other.
[2] Above, Vol. XV, p. 40.
[3]It may be pointed out that initial ī, which is formed by a vertical stroke with a dot on either side about its middle, does have a nail-head, as may be seen in one of the brief records at the cave of Durgākho. See A. S. I. Reports, Vol. XI, p. 127, Pl. XXXVIII, inscr. A ; Vol. XXI, p. 129, Pl. XXXII, inscr. No. 2. The sign in question is read as i by Cunningham, whereas in reality it represents ī, as is evidenced by several other inscriptions, both early and late, northern as well as southern, where essentially the same form of the latter is met with. Compare, for instance, C. I. I., Vol. III, Pl. III-B, text l. 61 ; Pl. XXX-A, text 1. 6; above, Vol. VIII, Pl. facing p. 287, text l. 28 ; Antiquities of Chamba State, Part 1, Pl. XV, text 1. 1 ; above Vol. VI. Pl. facing p. 317, text l. 18 ; Vol. V, Pl. facing p. 8, text l. 9 ; Pl. facing p. 51, text l. 31 ; etc. The same occurs also in the Bower manuscript which is assignable to about the fifth century. See Bühler’s Indische Palaeographic. Table VI. l.4.
[4]Ind. Ant., Vol. V, Pl. facing p. 155, text l. 24.

Home Page

>
>