The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Dr. Bhandarkar

J.F. Fleet

Prof. E. Hultzsch

Prof. F. Kielhorn

Prof. H. Luders

J. Ramayya

E. Senart

J. PH. Vogel

Index-By V. Venkayya

Appendix

List of Plates

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

stone tablet, which was found near a temple of Hanumat at Mantrawâḍi and is now stored in the kachêri at Shiggaon.

At the top of the stone, there are sculptures representing the goddess Lakshmî, squatting andfacing full-front, with an elephant on each side, standing towards her ; the tips of the trunks of the elephants, which are uplifted, meet above her head ; and each of them holds, apparently, a flower over her.─ The writing covers an area about 2’ 0½” broad by 3’ 9¼” high, and is mostly in a state of very good preservation. In addition to the record edited and shewn in the collotype, there is one line of writing below the sculptures, which are, as usual, on a surface which projects somewhat in front of that part of the stone which bears the body of the record. It is in characters of the same type with those of the body of the record ; and it gave the name of the writer : but the greater part of it is damaged and illegible ; we can only recognise, at the beginning of the line Śrî-Rê(?)vayyana, and at the end likhitam, with perhaps a cross-mark below the m, as if to shew that something is to be supplied here,─ namely, possible, the aksharas, standing before the Svasti of line 1 of the body of the record, which are not wanted there and seem to be meaningless.─ The characters are Kanarese, boldly formed and well executed. The size of them ranges from about ¾” in the dha of dharmmadoḷ, line 22, to about 1¾” in the va of goravaruṁ, line 8 ; the lchi of pelchisal, line 15, and the ṭṭa of koṭṭar, line 17, are each about 2⅜” high. The lingual is not very clearly, if at all, distinguished from the dental d. As regards the palæography,─ the does not occur.

t>

The j occurs four times, in lines 2, 3, and 8, and is, in each case, of the old square type : the exact form aimed at in this record, is illustrated best in the of râjâdhi, line 2, No. 2 ; it is a closed form, of that particular shape from which there may have been derived, quite directly, the back-to-back j and the open j which we have in the Doḍḍahuṇḍi inscription of Nîtimârga and Satyavâkya.[1] The kh occurs three times, in lines 6, 17, and 20, and again in likhitam in the line below the sculptures : in each case, it is of the later cursive type ; and the form of it is practically identical with the modern form of the present day ; it is seen best in the kha of akhaṇḍita, at the end of line 17. The b occurs more often, and is of the later cursive type, throughout ; the intended form of it is seen very clearly in the of bâdhâ, line 16, No. 11, and is to be recognised as almost identical with the modern form of the presently day. The l occurs more freely, and is, also, of the later cursive type, throughout, including the l in likhitam in the line below the sculptures ; the particular form of it aimed at in this record, is perhaps exhibited most clearly in the la of kâlaṁ, line 17¸ No. 2. Except in the l of rakshisal, line 15, where it is hardly to be detected, in the l, as presented in this record, we can recognise a feature which played an important part in the process by which the later cursive type of this character was evolved from the old square type, namely, the miniature representation, of the principal part of the old square character, which stands here in the centre of the later cursive character. In the development of the later character, the first step was the prolongation, with a sweep to the right, of the downstroke with which the formation of the original character ended,─ a feature which is well illustrated in the Hattî-Mattûr inscription of the time of Kṛishṇa I. ;[2] that was eventually followed by a continuation of that stroke up to the top line of the writing ; and, meanwhile, the principal part of the original character was diminished, rounded off, and raised, until the original leading characteristic of the old square letter was almost entirely lost. In some Kanarese fonts of the present day, it has disappeared altogether,─ for instance, in the font used, in accordance with the general custom, in the Rev. Dr. F. Kittel’s Kannaḍa-English Dictionary ; on the other hand, the miniature of the principal part of the old square character is distinctly recognisable in the font used for the words presented in Kanarese characters in the compilation entitled Bombay Places and Common Official Words. In lines 7, 8, 14, 20 (twice), 21, and 22 of this record, we have a peculiar form of the m, for which at present the earliest limit is fixed by its occurrence in para-dattam= in line 14 of the Kanarese grant of

________________________________
[1] See Vol. VI. above, p. 42, and Plate.
[2] Vo. VI. above, p. 160, and Plate.

Home Page