The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Dr. Bhandarkar

J.F. Fleet

Prof. E. Hultzsch

Prof. F. Kielhorn

Prof. H. Luders

J. Ramayya

E. Senart

J. PH. Vogel

Index-By V. Venkayya

Appendix

List of Plates

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

Cuddalore (Kûḍalûr), the head-quarters of the South Arcot distrcit.[1] It consists of 9 lines in the Tamil alphabet and language and forms a single big sentence, which can, however, be dissolved into several distinct periods with the help of the gerunds kêṭṭu, ‘having heard,’ in line 2, and enru, ‘having said,’ in lines 3 and 4. The pronoun namakkum, ‘to us,’ in line 9 shows that the subject of the passage beginning in line 4 is the plural of the pronoun of the first person.

The language exhibits a few peculiarities. The letters and d are doubled after a nasal in yâṇḍḍu (l. 1), Śênddaº (l. 2) and elunddu (l. 9). Instead of the gerund koṇḍu (twice in l. 6, and l. 8), the poetical form koḍu occurs four times (ll. 2, 3, 4 and 9). Aruḷivittu (ll. 4 and 9), aruḷivikka (l. 9) and veṭṭivittu (l. 7) are vulgar forms of aruḷuvittu, etc.

This inscription is distinguished from most other South-Indian inscriptions, as it does not record a donation or similar transaction, but is of a purely historical character. It is dated in the 16th year of Tribhuvanachakravartin Râjarâjadêva (l. 1) and must have been engraved at the instance of two military officers (daṇṇâkka[2]), named Appaṇa and Samudra-Goppaya[3] (l. 5), in the service of the Hoyśaṇa (or Hoysaḷa) king Vîra-Nârasiṁhadêva (l. 1). This king had heard that Kôpperuñjiṅga had captured the Chôḷa emperor at Śêndamaṅgalam. Anxious to vindicate his title ‘the establisher to the Chôḷa country,’ he started from Dôrasamudra and conquered the Maha[ra] kingdom. When at Pâchchûr, he ordered the two above-mentioned officers to continue the campaign. They advanced through the enemy’s country until they reaches Śêndamaṅgalam, forced Kôpperuñjiṅga to release the Chôḷa emperor, and accompanied the latter into his dominions.

t>

The title ‘establisher of the Chôḷa country,’ which the inscription applies to Vîra-Nârasiṁhadêva (l. 3), and the statement that he conquered the Mahara kingdom, show that this king is identical with the Hoysaḷa Narasiṁha II., who in several inscriptions is styled ‘the establisher of the Chôḷa kingdom’ and ‘the uprooter of the Makara or Magara kingdom.’[4] As the inscriptions of Narasiṁha II. are dated between A.D. 1222 and 1234, it follows that the king Râjarâja, to whose 16th year the subjoined inscription belongs (l. 1), is the Chôḷa king Râjarâja III., who ascended the throne in A.D. 1216,[5] and whose 16th year accordingly corresponded to A.D. 1231-32. He is no doubt identical with the ‘Chôḷa emperor’ who was captured and released at Śêndamaṅgalam. The dates of other inscriptions of Râjarâja III. show that he continued to reign after his re-installation. His latest known date is A.D. 1243-44 in an inscription at Poygai.[6]

The subjoined inscription mentions a considerable number of geographical names. Dôrasamudra, the capital of Narasiṁha II., is the modern Haḷêbîḍ in the Bêlûr tâluka of the Hassan district in the Mysore State. Pâchchûr, where he halted on his expedition against Kôpperuñjiṅga (l. 4), is perhaps identical with a village of that name in the Trichinopoly tâluka, opposite to the island of Śrîraṅgam, 2 miles north of the Coleroon river, and 9½ miles west by south of Kaṇṇanûr, the southern capital of Narasiṁha’s successor Sômêśvara.[7] If this identification of Pâchchûr is correct, it would follow that Narasiṁha II, left his dominions by way of the Gajalhaṭṭi pass, and that the Mahara (Makara or Magara) kingdom (l. 3) has to be looked for in the Coimbatore or Salem district. In the course of the expedition which Appaṇa and Samudra-Goppaya undertook against Kôpperuñjiṅga, they first destroyed the villages of Eḷḷêri, Kalliyûrmûlai and Tôludagaiyûr (l. 5). Then they worshipped the god at Ponnambalam

_______________________________
[1] See Mr. Sewell’s Lists of Antiquities, Vol. I. p. 212, where the name is spelt ‘ Tiruvandipuram.’ The same erroneous form is found on the Madras Survey Map of the Cuddalore tâluka. The Postal Directory of the Madras Circle, p. 1350, has correctly ‘ Tiruvendipuram.’
[2] Daṇṇâkka and daṇâyaka are tadbhavas of the Sanskṛit daṇḍanâyaka ; see Ind. Ant. Vol. XX. p. 304 and note 7.
[3] The first part of this name is apparently derived from Dôrasamudra.
[4] Dr. Fleet’s Dyn. Kan. Distr. p. 507 ; Mr. Rice’s Ep. Carn. Vol. IV., Ng. 98, and Vol. VI., Kd. 12a.
[5] See page 9 above.
[6] South-Ind. Inscr. Vol. I. No. 64.
[7] Above, Vol. III. p. 8 f.

Home Page