The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Dr. Bhandarkar

J.F. Fleet

Prof. E. Hultzsch

Prof. F. Kielhorn

Prof. H. Luders

J. Ramayya

E. Senart

J. PH. Vogel

Index-By V. Venkayya

Appendix

List of Plates

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

of the 24th March A.D. 1143, and on this day the 7th tithi of the bright half of Chaitra commenced 8 h. 9 m., and the nakshatra by the equal space system was Ârdrâ for 23 h. 48 m., after mean sunrise ; i.e. the equinox took place while the moon was in the nakshatra Âradrâ, during the 7th tithi of the bright half. This result, moreover, shows that the tithi on the day now given by me was really, in agreement with the term su-tithi of the original text, an excellent tithi ; for, a seventh tithi of the bright half, on which ─ as is the case in the present instance ─ a Saṁkrânti takes place, is called Mahâjayâ, and for making donations is superior even to an eclipse.[1]

For these reasons I have no doubt whatever that the 24th March A.D. 1143 is the proper equivalent of the date, and that the Śaka year intended is 1065, not 1056. The writer of the date has wrongly written rasa-viśikha-, instead of viśikha-rasa-.
__________________________

No. 2.─ DATES OF PANDYA KINGS.?
BY F. KIELHORN, PH.D., LL.D., C.I.E.; GÖTTINGEN.
(Continued from Vol. VI. page 315.)

I herewith publish thirteen more Pâṇḍya dates, the European equivalents of which may be given with certainty. Eight of these dates, in addition to regnal years, also give the Śaka years in which the dates fell, and the three latest dates, Nos. 41-43, also quote the corresponding Jovian years, according to the southern luni-solar system. I have still a number of other dates ─ of apparently twelve different Pâṇḍya kings─ the publication of which may be deferred to the time when more dates of the same kings have been discovered.[2]

t>

A.─ VIRA-PANDYA.
31.─In the Kailâsapati temple at Śrîvaikuṇṭham.
[3]

2 . . . . . . . . . . śrî-Vi(vî)ra-Pâṇḍiyadê[va]rkku yâ- 3 ṇḍu 15vadu Kâ[r*]tt[i]gai-mâ[da*]ttu 13 tiyad[i]yum apara-pakshattu saptam[i]yum Viyâla-kkilamaiyum perra Magattu nâḷ.

“In the 15th year (of the reign) of the glorious Vîra-Pâṇḍyadêva,─ on the day of Maghâ, which corresponded to a Thursday, and to the seventh tithi of the second fortnight, and to the 13th solar day of the month of Kârttigai.”

Between A.D. 1200 and 1500 the only year for which this date would be correct, is 1267. In this year the Vṛiśchika-saṁkrânti took place 13 h. 33 m. after mean sunrise of Friday, the 28th October. The 13th day of the month of Vṛiśchika (or Kârttigai) therefore was Thursday, the 10th November A.D. 1267 ; and on this day the 7th tithi of the dark half (of the month Kârttika) ended 8 h. 9 m., and the nakshatra was Maghâ, by the equal space system for 19 h. 42 m., by the Brahma-siddhânta for 5 h. 16 m., and according to Garga for 7 h. 53 m., after mean sunrise.
_________________

[1] Compare Ind. Ant., Vol. XXVI. p. 178.
[2] The date No. 32, here published, has been sent to me by Dr. Hultzsch quite recently. It proves the correctness of the equivalent which I had previously ascertained for the date No. 31, but which for want of confirmation I did not wish to publish with my first series of Pâṇḍya dates.
[3] No. 174 of the Government Epigraphist’s collection for 1895.

Home Page