The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Corrigenda

Images

Introduction

The Discovery of the Vakatakas

Vakataka Chronology

The Home of The Vakatakas

Early Rulers

The Main Branch

The Vatsagulma Branch

Administration

Religion

Society

Literature

Architecture, Sculpture and Painting

Texts And Translations  

Inscriptions of The Main Branch

Inscriptions of The Feudatories of The Main Branch

Inscriptions of The Vatsagulma Branch

Inscriptions of The Ministers And Feudatories of The Vatsagulma Branch

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE MAIN BRANCH

 

the homonymous king of the Later Gupta dynasty, mentioned in the Dēo-Bārṇārk pillar inscription and thus relegated the Vākāṭakas to the eighth century A.C. His opinion was accepted by Kielhorn and Sukhtankar. The present inscription, which states clearly that Prabhāvatī was the daughter of the Early Gupta king Chandragupta II, proved unmistakably, for the first time, that she lived in the last quarter of the fourth century A.C. It has since been shown that Dēvagupta was a favourite name of Chandragupta II and so it finds a mention in Vākāṭaka grants.

...As for the localities mentioned in the present grant, Nandivardhana was identified by Hiralal with Nandardhan or Nagardhan near Rāmṭēk. The identification has since been corroborated by several proofs. The other villages, however, remained unidentified. A clue to their location was afforded by the Jāmb plates of Pravarasēna II, discovered in 1940, which also mention the same Supratishṭha āhāra. With this clue I could identify some of the villages mentioned in the present grant. Vilavaṇaka seems to be Vaṇī, about 24 miles to the west, and Kadāpiñjana, Kadhājan 3 miles to the south by east of Hiṅgaṇghāṭ Hiṅgaṇghāṭ seems therefore to occupy the same position as the ancient village Daṅguṇa, The latter place-name appears to have been changed to Hiṅgaṇ in course of time, ghāṭ being added to it as it was a fording place on the Wunnā. It is noteworthy that the name of the village Kavaḍghāṭ on the opposite bank of the same river also ends in ghāṭ. As the village mentioned in the Jāmb plates as situated in the Supratishṭha āhāra can also be located in the Hiṅgaṇghāṭ tahsil, that āhāra seems to have comprised roughly the territory now included in that tahsil. The present plates of Prabhāvatīguptā, though discovered in distant Poonā, seem therefore to have originally belonged to the Hiṅgaṇghāṭ tahsil.

t>

TEXT1

images/7

_________________________

1 From the facsimiles facing p. 42 in Ep. Ind., Vol. XV.
2 Read वृष्‍टम्‌. This word occurs in the margin between lines 2 and 3.
3 Read नन्दिवर्द्धना- as in No. 3, line 1.
4 Read अनेक-

<< - 6 Page