|
INTRODUCTION
Trivhuvanamalla of the present charter may therefore be identified with Gūvaladēva, the eldest son of Jayakēśin I (published Ep. Ind., Vol. XXX, p. 71).
No. 16 received for examination through the Collector of South Satara and
now preserved in the Museum at Sangli belongs to king Kṛishṇaḍēvarāya of
Vijayanagara and is dated Śaka 1434, Aṅgirasa, (= 1512. A.C.). It records the
gift by the king of the village Niṭāla renamed Kṛishṇarāyapura situated in the
Kopaṇa-sīma in Paḍuva-nāḍaka, a sub-division of Hastināvati-rājya to Timmājyōtisha of Arsīkere as sarvamānya-agrahāra. Kopaṇa-sīma corresponds to
the region around Kopbal in the Raichur District in the Hyderabad State, north
of the Tuṅgabhadrā. That this region formed part of the Vijayanagara kingdom
during this period is learnt from the present record which refers to the kingdom
of Vijayanagara as Hastināvati-rājya, Hastināvati evidently standing for
Ānegondi near Hampi (Vijayanagara).
No. 59 from Bellary in the Madras state belongs to king Adil Shāh of Bijāpur
and is dated Śaka 1596, Ānanda which corresponds to 1674. A.C. The inscription states that while Adil Shāh Pādshāh was ruling the country from Penugoṇḍa
and while Abdul Hussain Sāhib was administering the region on behalf of the
Pādshāh, a deed conferring the right of collecting some dues from the Vaiśya
community was executed under the orders of the ruler in favour of Bhūpatyāchārya, son of Bhāskara Paṇḍita the high priest of the Vaiśya community as
against Kṛishṇaya who claimed the same right. On the date cited in the record,
the ruler of Bijāpur was Sikandar Adil Shāh, a boy of seven years. That on
this date the authority of the Nawab of Bijāpur extended south as far as Penugoṇḍa in the Anantapur District is attested by the present record. This is
noteworthy, as not long after this date, the Marāṭhā chief Śivāji overran this
country, and raided the southern regions as far as Tanjore in or before 1677 A. C.
From Pondicherry was received a curious bronze plaque, the obverse of which
contains sculptures in seven rows depicting several gods and goddesses and some
artisan tools. The reverse of the plaque contains an inscription (No. 55) in
Telugu which registers an agreement between two disputing artisan communities.
The disputants are said to have come to an agreement in the presence of a certain
Ḍakaṇāchāri who bears a number of interesting epithets such as the ‘lord of
Pendōlupura’, devotee of the goddess Kāḷikādēvī and Kamaṭhēśvara, etc. The
sculptured panels on the obverse of the plate evidently represent these deities and
the artisan tools, the emblems of the communities. The inscription is not dated
but may referred to the 16th or 17th century A.C. on palaeographical.
grounds.
Stone Inscriptions
Of the 415 stone inscriptions copied during the year the more important
are reviewed below.
From the caves at Kaṇhēri, Bombay State, 38 inscriptions were copied
Of these 24 have been already published and, of the remaining, an inscription in
Sanskrit may be noticed here. It is in cave No. 11 and is a long records of 16
lines composed mostly in verse (No. 169). The characters belong to the southern
alphabet of about the 5th century A.C. The epigraph which is damaged seems
to record the grant of a village to the community of Buddhist monks. Mention
is made of Kṛishṇaśaila, i.e., Kaṇhēri, Dramiḷa and a Buddhist monk named
Kumāraguru. The existence of this inscription has been noticed previously
though it was not read (Lüder’s List, No. 997). Just below this is another Sanskrit inscription in Nāgarī characters of about the 8th-9th century A.C. (No. 170).
It consists of two lines and mentions Kṛishṇagiri-mahavihara.
An inscription engraved on a sculptured slab was discovered at Sāṅgsi in
the Kolhapur District (No. 140). The sculptures represent a lady of high rank
attended by followers and lying on a funeral pyre in flames. The characters
which are box-headed belong to the southern class of alphabets. The language
in Sanskrit. The epigraph which consists of a single verse in the Śārdūlavikrīḍita metre records the death of a queen by name Hālidēvī who died young and
|
\D7
|