The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Images

EDITION AND TEXTS

Inscriptions of the Chandellas of Jejakabhukti

An Inscription of the Dynasty of Vijayapala

Inscriptions of the Yajvapalas of Narwar

Supplementary-Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE CHANDELLAS OF JEJAKABHUKTI

_________________
1 The reading this name is uncertain due to the similarity of the forms of dh and v. The stroke here, as also below, is probably used to show that the letter preceding it is a concise form of a word denoting a surname.
2 The consonant m is not marked below, here and in most of the instances, below ; but it is not everytime shown in the transcript.
3 The first syllable of a word showing gōtra is changed here to bhā (from bha), which is really the first letter of the gōtra which traces descent from the sage Bhāradvāja.
4 The sandhi is not observed here, as also in almost all the cases below. Similarly, the vibhaktis too are missing, and no corrections have been shown in the transcript, to minimise the numbers of footnotes. So also with the redundant insertions of the punctuation marks.
5 A mātrā also above this letter was originally cut, and later on erased.
6 C. observed that this name is perhaps Pariṇāha, but it can also be a corrupt form of Padmanābha
7 The curve of the mātrā above this letter is not visible.
8 The daṇḍa is so placed as to appear as a punctuation mark or a mātrā-sign of the next letter. Then are many cases of this type, below.
9 The consonant of this akshara can also be read as dh or v.
10 By a wrong chisel stroke, this akshara looks like chau.
11 The letter in the brackets is mutilated and may also have before it.

Home Page

>
>