The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

Preface

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Political History

Administration

Social History

Religious History

Literary History

Gupta Era

Krita Era

Texts and Translations

The Gupta Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

POLITICAL HISTORY

the moon) the ocean of the Gupta race”. This leaves no doubt as to the family name ‘Gutta’ being identical with ‘Gupta’. Now, it is worthy of note that the members of the family are described not only as Vikramāditya-vaṁś-ōdbhava, “born in the race of Vikramāditya” but also as Chandragupta-vaṁś-ōdbhava, “born in the race of Chandragupta”. It is also worthy of note that the hereditary titles, which commemorated their place of origin, were Ujjayanī-puravar-ādhīśvara, “supreme lord of Ujjayanī, the best of towns” and Pāṭalipuravar-ādhīśvara, “supreme lord of Pāṭali, the best of towns”. And to crown all, we are told that they were descended through a Vikramāditya, who is specified as king of Ujjayanī, and whom one record represents plainly as himself a descendant of Chandragupta. Now who could this ancestor of the Guttas or Guptas of Guttal be, who was not only Chandragupta by name, but also a descendant of Chandragupta, and who, again, not only had the title Vikramāditya but also was a king of Pāṭaliputra. He can be no other than Chandragupta II, grandson of Chandragupta I, of the Imperial Gupta dynasty. And, as the place of origin of his descendants, namely, the Guttas of the south, is represented once as Pāṭaliputra and once as Ujjayanī, the natural conclusion is that this Chandragupta II had two capitals, one Pāṭaliputra and the other, Ujjayanī.

>

        It has been assumed above that Chandragupta II bore the title or epithet of Vikramāditya. This is, however, quite clear from a critical study of his coin,1 which, again, throw light upon the other titles by which he was known. The most pre-eminent of these was Vikrama,2 which was to Chandragupta II, what Parākrama was to his father, Samudragupta. There were many combinations formed out of Vikrama as there were out of Parākrama. Like Vyāghra-Parākrama of Samudragupta, we have Siṁha-Vikrama for Chandragupta II. Coins bearing this epithet are known to the numismatist as the Lion-Slayer Type which has been distinguished into at least four classes and each further into a number of varieties.3 On the obverse the king stands, wearing waist-cloth with sash, turban and jewellery, shooting with bow at a lion and trampling on the animal with one foot. These details, however, vary with the varieties. It is, no doubt, tempting to take this Type of coins as indicating that Chandragupta annexed Kāṭhiāwāṛ, in the Gīr forest of which alone the Indian lions at present exist. But the lion was formerly found throughout the greater part of North-western and Central India. “In the early part of the nineteenth century, lions occurred in Hariyāṇā, Khāndēsh, and Rewah and as far east as Palamau, whilst up to 1860 or 1870 many existed in Kāṭhiāwāṛ and parts of Rajputana”.4 The Lion-Slayer Type cannot thus be taken as a sure indication of Chandragupta’s conquest of Kāṭhiāwāṛ. And we have, therefore, to understand that as among animals the tiger and the lion afford the best standard of comparison, Samudragupta is taken to surpass the former and his son Chandragupta the latter animal in strength and agility. The court poets were so fond of Comparing Chandragupta to the lion, that they invented not only Siṁha-Vikrama but Siṁha-Chandra also.5 This combination of names in not noticeable in the case of other Gupta kings. Thus we have Vyāghra-Parākrama and Siṁha-Mahēndra, but not Vyāghra-Samudra and Siṁha-Kumāra, in the case of Samudragupta and Kumāragupta I, respectively. What is further noteworthy about Chandragupta is that Vikrama was combined with Āditya and developed into the title Vikramāditya. It is somewhat difficult to know what this name exactly means, that is, whether it means ‘the Sun of Valour’ as it is generally interpreted or ‘Valour who is (also) the Son’. The latter seems to be the better of the two explana-
_______________________________________________________

1 Allan, Catalogue of the Coins of the Gupta Dynasty, pp. 35-37 and 49-50; V.A. Smith, Catalogue of the Coins in the Indian Museum, Calcutta, Vol. I, p. 109.
2 Allan, loc. cit., pp. 24 ff.; V. A. Smith, loc. cit., pp. 105 ff.
3 Allan, loc. cit., pp. 39 ff.
4 Imperial Gazetteer of India, Vol. I, pp. 217-18.
5 Allan, loc. cit., p. 43.

>
>