The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Epigraphia Indica

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

SPURIOUS SUDI PLATES.


The earlier Western Gaṅgas,
according to the spurious grants.

_________________________________________________________________

Museum grant, it may be added that portions of the text are bodily misplaced ; and the context is so mixed up that, without the other records as a guide, most of it would be hopelessly unintelligible.

......The next point to command attention is the palæography of the grants, as far as published lithographs are available.

......The Tanjore grant purports to have been issued in A.D. 248. But every character in it betrays a far later date ; and, taken all together, they point to the tenth century A.D., as the earliest possible period for the fabrication of the record. This was recognised by Dr. Burnell (South-Indian Palæography, pp. 34, 35, and Plate xi.), who classed the alphabet among the Grantha-Tamil alphabets, and expressed the opinion that the documents,— distinctly styled by him “a forgery,”— shews the condition of the northern Chêra characters about the tenth century. A most tell-tale character in this record is the l : it is distinctly a Grantha character of a late type ; and the only approximation to it, that I can find , is in the Grantha alphabet exhibited by Dr. Burnell in his Plate xiv., and allotted by him to A.D. 1383.

 

>
>