|
North
Indian Inscriptions |
|
|
BITRAGUNTA GRANT OF SAMGAMA II.
Professor Aurfect,1 he died in died in A.D. 1387. All that we can at present gather regarding the
genealogy of Mâdhava and Sâyaṇa, is as follows :—
.............................................Mayana
.............................................married Srimati.
.........................................................I...........................................................................
........I............................................... I...............................................I
Madhava,.....................Sayana,
Minsiter of Samgama II. ...........Bhoganatha,
ministerof Bukka I .........and of Harihara II. ...............................court-jester
of Samgama II.
......According to Mr. Sewell’s Lists of Antiquities, Vol. I. p. 142, Biṭraguṇṭa, the first of the
villages granted, is situated 7 miles south by west of Kâvali, which is 32 miles from Nellûr
(Nellore) and is the head-quarters of the Kâvali tâlûka in the Nellore district. Its situation is
described in the inscription as being 3 yôjanas north of the town of Vikramasiṁhapura in
the district called Pâkavishaya, which was situated on the shore of the Eastern ocean, i.e. the
Bay of Bengal (verse 19). I do not know if the name Vikramasiṁhapura still exists ; but the
name Pâka survives in the name of a certain sect of Telugu-speaking Śûdras in the Mysore
territory, who profess to come from Pâkanâḍu, the country of Pâka, and are as such called
Pâkanâṭis. The other village, Siṁkêśari, is said to be situated in the district called
Mulikidêśa on the northern bank of Pennâ, i.e. the well-known Pennêr river, and to the
north of the Śaiva temple at Pushpâchala (verse 24), which is identical with Pushpagiri, 8 miles north of Kaḍapa (Cuddapah). A native of Pushpagiri informed me that close to
Pushpagiri is a village named Suṅkêsaru, which appears to be the same as the Siṁkêśari of
the grant. It may be also remarked that a certain class of Smârta Brâhmaṇas, who call
themselves Mulikinâḍuvâru, profess to have emigrated from the Muliki country. The other
places mentioned in the inscription as the boundaries of the two villages (verses 22 and 25)
I am unable to identify. But so much is certain that Saṁgama II. held portions of the
present Nellore and Cuddapah districts, while his uncle Bukka I. was reigning at
Vijayanagara. Saṁgama II. can scarcely have been dependent on Bukka I., as he would have
otherwise referred to the latter as his overlord in his inscription. The fact that he represents
his own father Kampa as the actual successor of Harihara I. also suggests that he considered
himself entirely independent of Bukka I.
TEXT.2
First Plate ; First Side.

_______________________________________________________________________________
......1 Catalogue Catalogorum, p. 711.
......2 From the original copper-palates and ink-impressions of them.
......3 Read .
......4 Read .
|
\D7
|