The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

Mewār and were given a position by the lord of Delhi but afterwards returned to Mewār and thus it is clear that God had created two places for Kshatriyas (viz., Delhi and Mewār). Then the Khāna again asked the Bhaṭṭa as to how many horsemen the Rānā possessed. The Bhatṭa’s answer was “ twenty thousand ” ; whereupon the Khāna said : “ Well, the lord of Dillī possesses one hundred thousand horsemen. How then is there equality between the two ?”. The Bhaṭṭa answered that the Creator had meant that the Rānā’s twenty thousand horsemen are equal to one hundred thousand horsemen of the lord of Dillī. Thereafter the Khāna and Jayasiṁha had a talk with each other, and it was settled that, if the Rānā’s son accompanied the Khāna and saw Shāhijahāṁ, he (the Khāna) would see that the lord of Dillī (Sahijahāṁ) gave fourteen cities to the Rānā.[1]

Thus Madhusūdana rendered a loyal service to the Rānā. After considering how his priest’s son had a conference with the son of the lord of Dillī, Rājasiṁha sent the Mahākumāra (the senior prince) Sultānasiṁha along with a number of Ṭhakkuras in the company of Dārasakōha (Dārā Shukoh) to meet Shāhjahān.

Rājasiṁha, who in respect of fortune, liberality and prowess was equal to Vikramāditya, gave away in charity his mother Janādē’s weight in silver, and also redeemed himself of the pledge of an elephant-gift by giving five hundred silver coins to Bhaṭṭa Madhusūdana.

He sent the vaiśya Rāghavadāsa to the fort of Maṇḍalagaḍha (Mandalgarh, 100 miles to the north-east of Udaipur) and had the Rāṭhōḍa Rūpasiṁha[2] driven out of the fort.

>

In the year 1713 on the fullmoon day of Kārttika he performed the Brahmāṇḍaka gift at the temple of Ēkaliṅga, according to the Vedic rituals. This gift of Rājasiṁha is praised by the poet in vv. 32-36.

Rājasiṁha, thinking that it was not proper to perform an aśvamēdha sacrifice in the Kali age, did the following in order to gain all the merit of that sacrifice : In the year 1713, on the 11th day of the bright half of the month of Pausha, on the auspicious day of Manvādi, he gave away a white horse, Nanala by name, along with a gold saddle, to his guru Madhusūdana.

After that the king Rājasiṁha went to Banaras along with his guru Madhusūdana and stayed there (for a while).

Slab VIII ; Canto VII

In the year 1714, on the 10th day of the bright fortnight of Vaiśākha, the king (Rājasiṁha) set out on his victorious expedition. Then follows the description of flags, cannons with cannon balls (or guns with bullets), armour of the kings, etc. There is then a conventional enumeration of different countries not only in India but even outside India represented as fearing danger from Rājasiṁha, viz., Aṅga, Kaliṅga, Vaṅga, Utkala, Mithilā, Gauḍa, Pūrva (parts of U. P. and Bihar), Laṁkā, Konkan, Karṇāṭa, Malaya (Malabar), Draviḍa, Chōḷa, Sētubandha (Rāmēśvara), Surāshṭra, Kachchha, Taṭṭa (in Karachi Dist.), Valaka (Balkh), and Khaṁdhāra (Kandhāhār), etc. His specific exploits, however, were as follows :

(1) Destruction by his solders of the city of Darībā.[3]
(2) A tribute of 22,000 rupees from the inhabitants of Maṇḍala (Māṇḍal in the former Udaipur State).
(3) A similar tribute by the people of Vanahēḍā (Banarā, 5 miles east of Maṇḍal).
(4) A similar tribute from the people of Sāhipurā (former Shāpurā estate).

_______________________________________________

[1] See above, p. 99, note 5.
[2] Ruler of Kishangarh who received the Jāgīr of Mandalgarh from Aurangzed (see Ojha, Vol. I, p. 536).
[3] Approximately 12 miles north-east of Kankroli Railway station.

Home Page

>
>