The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

siṁha would be too late for one and too early for the other. There is an inscription of Samarasiṁha, son of Kītuka, the founder of the Sōngirā branch of the Chāhamānas who ruled in Mārwār, which is dated in V.S. 1239[1], long before the time of Bhuvanasiṁha. Alāuddīn attacked Chitor when Lakshmaṇasiṁha, grandson of Bhuvanasiṁha, was the Sisōdā chief. In the Kumbhalgarh inscription, Jaitrasiṁha alias Rāvala Jayasiṁha is said to be ruling over the four countries of Chitor, Āghāṭa, Mēdapāṭa and Vāgaḍa with his seat at Nāgahrada which shows that the whole of the former possessions of the Guhilas came under their power once again.

Again, the twelve chiefs from Rāhapa onwards belonged to the Sisōdā branch and not to the Rāval branch of Mawār. These are, according to the praśasti, Rāhapa, his son Narapati, Dinakara (omitted in the praśasti), Jasakarṇa, his son Nāgapāla, his son Puṇya(Pūrṇa)pāla, his son Pṛithvīmalla, his son Bhuvanasiṁha, his son Bhīmasiṁha,[2] Jayasiṁha, his son Lakshmasiṁha, mentioned in the Rājapraśasti as the ruler of Maṇḍalgarh, who died with his 12 brothers and 7 sons defending Chitor against Alāuddīn Khaljī, and Ajēsī (Ajayasiṁha), his only surviving son who succeeded his father.

It may be mentioned here that the Sadaḍī inscription of the time of the Mahārāṇā Kumbhakarṇa (V.S. 1496),[3] mentioned before, also gives the names of Bhuvanasiṁha, his son Jayasiṁha, Lakshmasiṁha, his son Ajayasiṁha, and his brother Arisiṁha after Samarasiṁha of the Rāval branch, but Ratnasiṁha’s name is altogether omitted. The Rājapraśasti, however, mentions Ratnasī but puts him as the brother of Lakshmasiṁha. But we know form the Kumbhalgarh inscription of V.S. 1517 and the Ēkaliṅga Māhātmya that Ratnasiṁha was from son and successor of Samarasiṁha of Mewār while Lakshmasiṁha belonged to Sisōdā.[5] At the time of the siege of Chitor, Lakshmasiṁha must have been in Chitor in command of the fort on behalf of Ratnasiṁha. The history of Mewār is a bit confused at this period and the statements given in the bardic and Muslim chronicles do not agree.

>

There is no reference in the Rājput chronicles of the occupation of Chitor by Alāuddīn who left it in charge of his son Khizir Khān and then of Māladēva, the Soṅgirā Chāhamāna ruler, as stated by the Muslim historians. Again, according to the Rājapraśasti, Arisiṁha died with his father Lakshmasiṁha in the battlefield and his brother Ajēsī (Ajayasiṁha) seems to have been the chief of Sisōdā.[4] It seems certain that the line of the Rāval branch of Mewār ended with Ratnasiṁha till Hammīra, son of Arisiṁha of the Sisōdā branch, reconquered Chitor and thus brought Mewār under the rule of the Sisōdās. From Hammīra onwards the information given by the author of the Rājapraśasti, though meagre, is more authentic. As is usual in such cases, the poet has scrupulously avoided any reverses that his patron and his ancestors may have suffered, exaggerated their achievements and mixed up legends with history following the tradition of the bards, but all the same he had given quite a lot of information which is interesting and can be verified from other sources. Many of these have been noticed in the footnotes to the abstract of contents.

Two chronological tables, one from Guhila to Hammīra, compiled from early inscriptions, and another from Hammīra to Jayasiṁha, the last ruler included in the Rājapraśasti, are appended here with known dates of the rulers mentioned. In the Kumbhalagarh inscription of Rāṇā Kumbhā (V.S. 1517), it is claimed that the genealogy of the early rulers as given there has been compiled with great care after studying many old praśastis[6] and this claim seems to be justified.

______________________________________________

[1] Above, Vol. XI., pp. 53 f.
[2] Tod wrongly mentions him as the husband of Padminī.
[3] A.S.I. An. Rep., 1907-08, pp. 214 f.
[4] Bhandarkar in his Genealogical List includes him in the Rāval branch.
[5] This is the relationship given in the Sadaḍī inscription also. But according to the Cambridge History of India (Vol. III, p. 525), Arsi was the eldest son of Ajai Sing who was appointed to the command of Chitor by Alāuddīn.
[6] Above, Vol. XXIV, p.324, v. 138.

Home Page

>
>