|
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
7 Surāṇḍi-nāmnaḥ putrasya Kāsya(śya)pa-sagōtrasya Sēnā-
8 pati-[1]Ira-nāmnaḥ Uchisama-grāmē[2] dakshiṇa-bhāgē Vā-
9 ṅkilāṇḍā-bhūmi-pād-ādhika-vāṭivā(kā)-dvaya[3] śrī-Kīrttivā[4]-
10 sadē[va]sy=āgrētē[5] akhaṇḍa-dīp-[ai]kaṁ(kam) ahaṁ dadāmi
11 ||o|| Va(Ba)labhadrapurīyē(ya)-bhūmi-māṇa-shaṭ pu[tkā(ṇy-ā)]rthē [||*]
Inscription No. 2
1 .................... [6][ga]vat-Purushōttama-putra-
2 .................... [7][rya]nt-ādhipati-sakala-vi-
3 ..................... [8]utta-śrī-Bhīmadēv-āvdē(bdē)
4 .................. [9][rē Chai]tra-śukla-Pau-[10]
5 ................ [11]Chitrā-nakshatrē sa-
6 ........................ [12]sya Kōṇṭharāṅga-visha-
7 ............................ [13][grā]mē bhūmi-vāṭikā-tra-
8 ............................. [14]vāsadēvāya naivēyaṁ[15] pu-
9 ........ [16][vā]ṭik-aikaṁ pānīyapatrīṁ(trīm) ahaṁ da
10 . . [17][pā]nīyam=[pā]ṭhi-Mā(Ma)hādēva-paṇḍita-Puru-
11 shōttama-Gōvinda-karaṇa-Śiunāta-karaṇē-[18]
12 shv=adhikārē dātavyō[19] mayā kim=va(m=ba)hun=ē=
13 [ti ||o||]
_________________________________________________
[1] The rule of Sandhi has been ignored here. The intended reading of the name may have been Īśvara.
[2] The reading of the name may also be Ḍachisama.
[3] Better read dvayēna.
[4] Better read Kṛittiº.
[5] Read ºāgrataḥ.
[6] The lacuna can be filled up with the letters Siddham svasti iti Bhaº as found in Inscription No. 1.
[7] The lacuna has to be filled up with the letters chatuḥ-sāgara-pāº as found in the other epigraph.
[8] As indicated above, the tended reading of the lost part may be ºdvayj-jan-ālaṅkṛita-Rāº.
[9] The last expression in the lacuna must have been saṁvatsarē; but the letters indicating the year cannot
determined.
[10] There is a daṇḍa here apparently to cover some empty space at the end of the line.
[11] The lacuna apparently contained the letters ºrṇṇamāsyāṁ .... vārē ; but the name of the week-day cannot be
determined.
[12] The name of the donee in the sixth case-ending must have found a place here.
[13] The first letter of this line seems to have been ºyē ; but the name of the village cannot be determined.
[14] The lacuna may be filled up with the letters ºyaṁ śrī-Kīrtti(Kṛitti)”.
[15] For naivēdyaṁ, naivēdy-ārthaṁ was apparently intended.
[16] We have to fill up the lacuna probably with ºnar=api. For pānīyapatrīṁ apparently pānīyapātr-ārtham
was intended.
[17] The lacuna has to be filled up with the letters ºdāmi (cf. Inscription No. 1, line 10).
[18] Read Śivanātha-karaṇānam=adhiº.
[19] Read dātavyam.
| 
