The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

Nārāyaṇavarman may have been celebrated when that king was too old and his son Bhūtivarman was ruling the country on his father’s behalf and that this was possibly the reason why Bhūtivarman is said to be the performer of the horse-sacrifice in the record of his own reign[1].

Nārāyaṇavarman was the first performer of the Aśvamēdha sacrifice among the king of the Bhauma-Nāraka dynasty of Kāmarūpa, which was founded by Pushyavarman. It is interesting to note in this connection that the independent status newly acquired by ancient Indian ruling families was usually signalised by the celebration of the Aśvamēdha[2]. In the ancient history of India, we have also many instances of a feudatory naming his son after his overlord[3]. The naming of Pushyavarman’s son as Samudravarman apparently after the celebrated Gupta monarch Samudragupta (circa 340-76 A.C.) appears to be a significant fact in the early history of Kāmarūpa. Samudravarman’s queen Dattavatī seems also to have assumed the name of Samudragupta’s queen Dattadēvī. These facts leave hardly any doubt that the Kāmarūpa king Pushyavarman was a vassal or subordinate ally of the Gupta emperor and flourished about the middle of the fourth century A.C.[4] The Bhauma-Nārakas of Kāmarūpa appear to have continued to offer allegiance to the Guptas till the beginning of the sixth century when the imperial Gupta power declined and the Bhauma-Nāraka king Nārāyaṇavarman (circa 494-518 A.C.) performed the horse-sacrifice no doubt to assert the newly gained independence of the kingdom of Kāmarūpa, formerly under the suzerainty of the Guptas. Again the facts that Pushyavarman was a contemporary of Samudragupta, that Susthitavarman and Supratishṭhitavarman appear to have died quite early in life and that Bhāskaravarman reigned in the period circa 600-50 A.C. suggest roughly the following chronology of the Bhauma-Nāraka kings of Kāmarūpa[5] :─

(1) Pushyavarman circa 350-74 A.C. (2) Samudravarman ,, 374-98 ,, (3) Balavarman ,, 398-422 ,, (4) Kalayāṇavarman ,, 422-46 ,, (5) Gaṇapativarman ,, 446-70 ,, (6) Mahēndravarman ,, 470-94 ,, (7) Nārāyaṇavarman ,, 494-518 ,, (8) Bhūtivarman ,, 518-42 ,, (9) Chandramukhavarman ,, 542-66 ,, (10) Sthiravarman ,, 566-90 ,, (11) Susthitavarman ,, 590-95 ,, (12) Supratishṭhitavarman ,, 595-600 ,, (13) Bhāskaravarman ,, 600-50 ,,

t>

__________________________________________

[1] The Śailodbhava records generally attributed an Aśvamidha to Sainyabhīta Mādhavavarman [1 Śrīnivāsa] but, in a few inscriptions of that king’s son and grandson, the latter are also vaguely described as performers of the Aśvamēdha probably because they took part in Śrīnivāsa’s sacrifice. Cf. above, Vol. XXIX, p. 39, n. 4.
[2] A New History of the Indian People, Vol. VI, pp. 64-65.
[3] See Successors of the Sātavāhanas, 1939, pp. 176, 248 note.
[4] The reference to Kāmarūpa as a pratyanta or bordering state in the Allahabad pillar inscription seems to suggest that the Kāmarūpa king was not regarded as an ordinary feudatory of the Gupta monarch.
[5] Dr. Bhattasali was inclined to assign Pushyavarman to circa 350-90 A.C. and Mahēndravarman (who according to him celebrated two horse-sacrifices) to circa 450-90 A.D. See IHQ, Vol. XXI, March, 1945, pp. 19-28.

Home Page