The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

1114-55 A.D.) is known to have granted land in the Pāṭnā District in 1124 A.D. and to have been staying at Monghyr in 1146 A.D.[1] His later contemporary, the Pāla king Madanapāla (circa 1144-61 A.D.), is similarly known to have held sway over the Pāṭṇā District in his third regnal year (circa 1146 A.D.) and the Monghyr District in his fourteenth (circa 1157 A.D.) and eighteenth (circa 1161 A.D.) regnal years.[2] Madanapāla’s successor Gōvindapāla (circa 1161-65 A.D.) is known to have held sway over the Pāṭṇā-Gayā region in his fourth regnal year (circa 1164 A.D.) but he was ousted from that area by the Gāhaḍavālas sometime before 1175 A.D.[3] The fact that a Pāla king named Palapāla (circa 1165-1200 A.D.), probably the successor of Gōvindapāla, was ruling over the Monghyr District in the thirtyfifth year of his reign would suggest that Gōvindapāla died about 1165 A.D. when the western part of South Bihār passed to the Gāhaḍavāla king Vijayachandra (circa 1155-70 A.D.) and that his successor Palapāla continued to rule over parts of East Bihār till the end of the twelfth century when that region was conquered by the Turkish Musalmans.[4] We have now to accommodate Ballālasēna’s hold over the Bhāgalpur region about 1166 A.D. As this date roughly coincides with that of the overthrow of Gōvindapāla by the Gāhaḍavālas, it is possible to think that the Gāhaḍavālas and Sēnas led a joint attack on the Pālas and advanced against South Bihār simultaneously from the west and east. Palapāla, however, may have succeeded in recovering East Bihār from the Sēnas although West Bihār appears to have continued to remain in the ha nds of the Gāhaḍavālas.

TEXT[5]

Siddham[6] pramēsara-ity-ādi-[7]śrī-Valalaśēṇa[8]-samata[9] 9 || tāmvara-khōli[10] data[11] ||[12] bhaṭṭāraka- śrī-Damachāditadēvapadānā[13] ||[12] maṭha-pati Chihōkasya[14] [||*].

t>

TRANSLATION

May there be success ! (In) the year 9 of (the reign of) the illustrious Valalaśēṇa (Ballālasēna) who is endowed with (the imperial titles) beginning with Pramēsara (Paramēśvara), a copper cover belonging to (i.e., caused to be made by) Chihōka, chief priest of the temple, is granted in favour of the illustrious lord Damachāditya.

B. Lai Inscription of Vikramadēvī ; Year 32 During my tour in the Monghyr District, I came to know of the recent discovery of some inscribed images at Lai lying about six miles from Kājrā and about ten miles from Lakkhīsarāi,

_________________________________________________

[1] Cf. JASL, Vol. XVIII, p. 81 ; above, Vol. VII, p. 98.
[2] Bhandarkar’s List, No. 1638 ; JRASBL, Vol. VII, p. 216 ; above, Vol. XXVIII, p. 145.
[3] JASL, Vol. XVII, pp. 27 ff.
[4] See JBRS, loc. cit.
[5] From the original.
[6] Expressed by symbol.
[7] Sanskrit paramēśvar-ētyādi (i.e., paramēśvar-ēty-ādi-rāj-āvalī-pūrvavat).
[8] Read Ballālasēna.
[9] Read Saṁvat.
[10] Sanskrit tāmra-khōlī or ºkhōlikā.
[11] Read dattā.
[12] The daṇḍas appear to be superfluous.
[13] Read Damachādityadēva-pādānāṁ. The reading does not seem to be Damarāº as the form of r in pramēsara and bhaṭṭāraka is different.
[14] The reading does not appear to be Rihōkasya. See note 13 above. We may suggest the emendation Chihōkēna.

Home Page