The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

the Kāñchīpuram region about 1230 A.C. in spite of his loss of the Śrīraṅgam area five years earlier, he must have occupied parts of that country for a considerable period of time. Under the circumstances, the silence of his court poet who composed the stanzas dealing with his achievements in regard to this spectacular success becomes inexplicable. The verses in question are quoted in Anaṅgabhīma’s own Nagarī plates[1] of 1230-31 A.C. as well as in the charters[2] of his successors. Fifthly, the evidence of the Nagarī plates clearly shows that the year 1230 A.C. was passed by Anaṅgabhīma III in his capital and its vicinity.[3] It is impossible to believe that he could have led an expedition against the Tamil land, about one thousand miles away, in the neighbourhood of that year.

But the most serious error in the consideration of the Kāñchīpuram inscriptions seems to be the identification of Abhinava-Vārāṇasī, where the Gaṅga king Anaṅgabhīma (actually, the donatrix Sōmaladēvī) is said to have been stationed, with Kāñchīpuram. It is well known from the Nagarī Plates[4] of Anaṅgabhīma III that he had his capital at Vārāṇasī, Abhinava-Vārāṇasī or Abhinava-Vārāṇasī-kaṭaka, which is the same as modern Cuttack on the Mahānadī in Orissa. It should be pointed out that there are numerous Vārāṇasīs in different parts of India ; but Cuttack seems to be the only Vārāṇasī with the word abhinava prefixed to it. We know that the Gaṅgas originally had their capital at Kaliṅganagara (modern Mukhaliṅgam near Śrīkākuḷam) ; but, sometime after the overthrow of the Sōmavaṁśīs of Orissa by Anantavarman Chōḍagaṅga about the beginning of the twelfth century A.C., they transferred their headquarters to Cuttack. Vārāṇasī-kaṭaka or Cuttack is mentioned as the Gaṅga capital not only in the above grant of Anaṅgabhīma III but also in the records of his successors.

t>

[5] The Muslim historians who have described Sultan Fīrūz Shāh’s expedition against the kingdom of Jājnagar (i.e., the Gaṅga kingdom of Orissa) in circa 1360 A.C. during the reign of Gaṅga Bhānu III (circa 1352-78 A.C.) mention the same city on the river Mahānadī as Banārasī (i.e., Vārāṇasī).[6] It is not known as to who amongst Anantavarman Chōḍagaṅga’s descendants transferred the capital from Kaliṅganagara to Cuttack. But the Mādalā Pāñjī[7] states that Anaṅgabhīma, who dedicated his kingdom to Purushōttama-Jagannātha, lived at Chaudvāra-kaṭaka on the Māhanadī, while his younger brother and successor, also called Anaṅgabhīma, transferred his residence from Chaudvāra-kaṭaka to Vāṇarāśī(Vārāṇasī)-kaṭaka, a city built by him at the site of a village called Vāravāṭi (in Kodiṇḍā Daṇḍapāṭa) on the other (i.e., southern) bank of the Mahānadī. The evidence of the Nagarī plates, coupled with that of the confused tradition of the Mādalā Pāñjī, however, suggests that it was Anaṅgabhīma III who was the builder of the new capital city called Abhinava-Vārāṇasī-kaṭaka. The correct interpretation of the Kāñchīpuram inscriptions seems to be that the Gaṅga queen Sōmaladēvī made a grant in favour of a Vaishṇava shrine at Kāñchīpuram while she was staying at Abhinava-Vārāṇasī (i.e., the present Cuttack) which was her husband’s capital. Making grants in absentia in favour of

________________________________________________

[1] Above, Vol. XXVIII, pp. 235 ff. (verses 72-80).
[2] JASB, Vol. LXV, Part I, pp. 248-9 (verses 72-80), etc.
[3] Above, Vol. XXVIII, pp. 244-46.
[4] Ibid., p. 256, text-lines 123 ff.
[5] See Bhandarkar’s List, Nos. 1122, 1125, SII, Vol. VI, No. 1069, etc. The city is mentioned in numerous other records. See SII, loc. cit., Nos. 708, 711, 722, 756, 792, 801, 808, 851, 586, 918, 958-60, 1003, 1022, 1041, 1045, 1051, 1079, 1083, 1089, 1096, 1104, 1105, 1107, 1119-20, 1135, etc.
[6] See Ray, DHNI, Vol. I, p. 491. For the celebrity enjoyed by Cuttack Banaras during the Mughal period, see Jarrett and Sarkar, Ain-i-Akbari (translation), Vol. II, p. 316, note 2.
[7] Op. cit., p. 27 : e-uttāre Ana gabhīmadevaṅka sāna-bhāi Bhīma-parirāeṅku Bhīmanagara-daṇḍapāṭuṁ āṇi rajā kale. e dutī Anaṅgabhīmadeva hoile. e-rajā nagara-Chaudvāre Kaṭake vije kari thānti. emantare eka-dinare rajāe vije kari dāsi Mahānadī pāra hoi e-nadīru dakshiṇa-tīre dekhile Kodiṇḍā-daṅḍapāṭara Vāravāṭi-grāmare Viśveśvaradevaṅkara sanidhe śāmala-pakshiki vaga māri vasi achhi. Ehā dekhi rājāe vaḍa āścharya pāi śubha-yoga-dinare e-Vāravāṭi-grāmare śubha dei naara tolāi Kaṭaka kari e-Kaṭaka nāma Vāṇarāśī-Kaṭaka voli nāma dei nagara-Chaudvāra-Kaṭaka chhāḍi āsi Kaṭaka kari rahile.

Home Page