The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Authors

Contents

D. R. Bhat

P. B. Desai

Krishna Deva

G. S. Gai

B R. Gopal & Shrinivas Ritti

V. B. Kolte

D. G. Koparkar

K. G. Krishnan

H. K. Narasimhaswami & K. G. Krishana

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam

Sadhu Ram

S. Sankaranarayanan

P. Seshadri Sastri

M. Somasekhara Sarma

D. C. Sircar

D. C. Sircar & K. G. Krishnan

D. C. Sircar & P. Seshadri Sastri

K. D. Swaminathan

N. Venkataramanayya & M. Somasekhara Sarma

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

“This sacred image of the Supreme Goddess was caused to be made according to the standard form through (the artist who was) a descendant of Kāśyapa by the illustrious Yuvarāja (i.e. crown-prince) Śrīvallabha, a piercing javelin to all the evil spirits.”

As we have noted earlier, Śrīvallabha was specially a Western Chālukya appellation. Hence, although the name of the crown-prince who was responsible for the setting up of the image[1] in question, is not specified, it goes without saying that he belonged to the Chālukya house of Bādāmi. It is difficult to surmise who this Chālukya prince could be, as he might be any one from Pulakēśin I to Vikramāditya I. But it is possible to think that this prince might have set up the image of the goddess while he was governing the area of Gooty as the viceroy of the ruling king.

The name of the artist or sculptor who actually shaped the image according to the standards prescribed in the texts on the subject (pramā-rūpēṇa) is not mentioned. Instead, it is merely said that he belonged to the lineage of Kāśyapa. This is interesting, for Kāśyapa was a renowned artist (śilpakāra)[2] and the present sculptor seemed to take more pride in mentioning the former as his ancestor than disclosing his own name.

t>

TEXT[3]

First Plate

1 Svasti [|*] ….[4]yati sat-pūjya[ṁ] pradīpta-kana[ka-pra*]bhaṁ(bham |) trailō-
2 kya-sad-asat-kāri Brahmaṇah[5]=krama-paṁkajaṁ(jam || 1)[6] Tad-anu vija-
3 [yi]n=Āgnishṭōm-Āgnichayana-Vājapēya[7]-Hiraṇyaga-
4 rbha-saṁbhūtāṁ(t-Ā)śvamēdh-āpa(va)bh[ṛi]tha-snāna-pavitrita-śa-

Second Plate, First Side

5 [rī]ra-Śrīpṛithivīvallabha-mahārājasya(sy=ā)gra-sū-
6 [nu*]-śrīmat-Pūgava[r]mmaṇā Raṇashṭātura[8]-nāmadhēyēna
7 [ai]hik-āmushmika-phal-[ā]kāṁkshiṇā Vārāhīdēva-sva(svā)-
8 . .[9] [Maḷa]kēṭaka-gr[ā]mē

______________________________________________

[1] The image may be that of Durgā, near which the record is incised.
[2] Śiddhēśvara Śāstrī Chitrāv, Prāchīna Charitrakōśa (Marāṭhī), p. 122.
[3] From impressions.
[4] There are traces of three worn out letters before this, which may be restored as śrīma[j]j].
[5] This jihvāmūlīya is indicated by a sign looking like a big superscript ma.
[6] Metre : Anushṭubh.
[7] [Read ºpēya-yājiº.─ D. C. S.]
[8]For a correct form of this name see the discussion above.
[9] The two damaged letters here may be minē.

Home Page