The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Authors

Contents

D. R. Bhat

P. B. Desai

Krishna Deva

G. S. Gai

B R. Gopal & Shrinivas Ritti

V. B. Kolte

D. G. Koparkar

K. G. Krishnan

H. K. Narasimhaswami & K. G. Krishana

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam

Sadhu Ram

S. Sankaranarayanan

P. Seshadri Sastri

M. Somasekhara Sarma

D. C. Sircar

D. C. Sircar & K. G. Krishnan

D. C. Sircar & P. Seshadri Sastri

K. D. Swaminathan

N. Venkataramanayya & M. Somasekhara Sarma

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

The details of the date on which the grant was made are :─ Śaka-varsha 630 (specifically mentioned as expired), eleventh regnal year, Āshāḍha, paurṇamāsī. The date is not verifiable, since the week-day is not given. Fleet has shown, on the strength of the Aihoḷe inscription,[1] that the month Śrāvaṇa of Śaka year 619 current (A.D. 696) was the first month of the first year of this king.[2] Accordingly Āshāḍha of Śaka 630 current would fall in the eleventh regnal year and not of the expired Śaka year as mentioned in the record. The date mentioned in the record would fall on Monday 20th June, A.D. 707.[3]

The inscription under study is interesting in more than one respect. The grant was issued when the royal camp was at the place called Kisuvolal. This place has been identified with modern Paṭṭadkal in Hungund Taluk, Bijapur District. It occurs as Kesuvoḷal in the Mahākūṭa inscription of Maṅgalēśa[4] and as Paṭṭadakisuvoḷal in later records.[5] Paṭṭadkal, together with Bādāmi and Aihoḷe, formed the metropolis of the early Chālukyas of Bādāmi and it was specially at Paṭṭadkal that the festival of paṭṭa-bandha (fillet-binding, i.e. coronation) was being celebrated. It may be pointed out that Kisuvolal is called a sthāna in our inscription whereas Vātāpi, i.e. Bādāmi is styled as adhishṭhāna in some of the early records.[6] Some of the other grants of Vijayāditya have been issued from Rāsēnagara,[7]Karahāṭanagara,[8] Ēlāpura,[9] Kuhuṇḍinagara,[10] and Raktapura.[11] The last name Raktapura also occurs as the place of royal camp in the Kendur plates of Kīrtivarman II, the grandson of Vijayaditya.[12] While editing the Kendur plates, Prof. K. B. Pathak suggested the identification of Raktapura with modern Lakshmēśvar in the Shirahatti Taluk of the Dharwar District. Fleet also was inclined to hold the same view.[13] This view is, however, not correct. We know that the ancient name of Lakshmēśvar was Puligere, Purigere, Pulikara or Purikara. In the inscription under study itself the forms Purigere, Pulikara and Purikara occur. We have to identify Raktapura with Kisuvalal from where the grant under consideration was issued. In fact Kisuº or Kesu-volal in Kannaḍa means ‘ red city ’ (kisu ‘ red ’, volal polal ‘ city ’) and it is quite clear that Raktapura is only a Sanskrit rendering of the Kannaḍa name.

t>

In line 32 of the inscription under study it is stated that Vijayāditya had gone to Vanavāsi in order to see the Ālupa king and lines 32-36 inform us that the name of this Ālupa ruler was Chitravāhana and that he belonged to the Pāṇḍya lineage. The early history of the Ālupa rulers is still shrounded in obsecurity.[14] We know from the Sorab plates[15] of the Chālukya king

_____________________________________________________

[1] Ind. Ant., Vol. VIII, p. 284.
[2] Bomb. Gaz., Vol. I, part II, p. 370, note 5.
[3] See Indian Ephemeris, Vol. I, part ii, p. 18.
[4] Ind. Ant., Vol. XIX, p. 17.
[5]Progress of Kannada Research in Bombay Province, 1941-1946, p. 54.
[6] Karnataka Inscriptions, Vol. I, Nos. 1, 2 and 4. For a discussion of the terms sthāna and adhishṭhāna meaning celebrated centres of religion, see Introduction to the same volume, pp. iii-v.
[7] Ind. Ant., Vol. IX, p. 125.
[8] Above, Vol. X, pp. 146 ff.
[9] Ind. Hist. Quart., Vol. IV, p. 245.
[10] An. Rep. S. I. E., 1934-35, App. A, C. P. No. 22.
[11] Above, Vol. XXV, pp. 21 ff.
[12] Ibid., Vol. IX, pp. 201 ff. A few stone records of Vinayāditya, Vijayādiya and Vikramāditya found at Lakshmēśvar are also issued from the city of Raktapura. Fleet has pointed out that these records, which are in the nature of copper-plate grants, were put on stone sometime later in the10th century A.D. See Bomb, Gaz., Vol. I, part II, pp. 368, 373 note 1, and p. 376.
[13] Bomb. Gaz., Vol. I, Part II, p. 304 note 6. [14] The Halmiḍi inscription of Kadamba Kākustha dated circa 450 A.D. mentions one Aḷapa (Mys. Arch-Rep., 1936. p. 73) and the Mahākūṭa inscription of Maṅgalēśa (Ind. Ant. XIX, p. 17) refers to an Āḷuka. We do not know whether they belonged to the early Ālupa or Ālupa dynasty.
[15] Ind. Ant., Vol. XIX, pp. 146 ff ; Ep. Car., Vol. VIII, Sb. 571.

Home Page