The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Authors

Contents

D. R. Bhat

P. B. Desai

Krishna Deva

G. S. Gai

B R. Gopal & Shrinivas Ritti

V. B. Kolte

D. G. Koparkar

K. G. Krishnan

H. K. Narasimhaswami & K. G. Krishana

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam

Sadhu Ram

S. Sankaranarayanan

P. Seshadri Sastri

M. Somasekhara Sarma

D. C. Sircar

D. C. Sircar & K. G. Krishnan

D. C. Sircar & P. Seshadri Sastri

K. D. Swaminathan

N. Venkataramanayya & M. Somasekhara Sarma

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

our record (710-11 A. D.). Similarly, Nanna referred to as the father of Rāshṭrakūṭa Śaṅkaragaṇa who issued the Daulatabad plates[1] dated Śaka year 715 (793 A. D.), too, cannot be identified with Ṇaṇṇa of our record due to the considerable gap of time between the two. A Rāshṭrakūṭa Nannarāja is mentioned in a Prakrit inscription engraved in nail-headed characters of the 8th of 9th century A. D. on the back wall of the chapel between caves XXVI and XXVII at Ajanta.[2] On account of closer proximity of time and place, Nannarāja of the Ajanta inscription may more plausibly be identified with Nanna of the Daulatabad plates than with the homonymous chief of our record.

The Bayana memorial stone inscription,[3] palaeographically datable in circa 8th century A. D., also refers (without specifying the family name) to a prince called Ṇaṇṇa during whose reign one Durgāditya was killed in the course of a fight at a place called Piṁpala-Gauṇḍala. Mere identity of name and similarity of script do not warrant the identification of this prince with Ṇaṇṇa of our record, as the tract of Bayana is not contiguous with the known extent of Nannarāja-Ṇaṇṇappa’s kingdom.[4]

The feudatory status of the family of Nannarāja-Ṇaṇṇappa is indicated by the non-assumption of paramount titles by any member of the family. We should also note the fact that Svāmirāja of the Nagardhan plates bears the significant epithet bhaṭṭāraka-pādānuddhyāta. The paramount rulers of Berar in the time of Svāmirāja (573 A. D.) were the Kalachuris who were ousted early in the 7th century A. D. by the Chālukyas of Badami. The territories of Pulakēśin II (610-42 A. D.) who is credited with the conquest of the three Mahārāshṭrakas included Berar and also probably Malwa which continued to form part of the Chālukya empire in the time of his successors, viz. Vikramāditya I (655-80 A. D.), Vinayāditya (618-96 A. D.), and Vijayāditya (679-733 A. D.). The last two were the Chālukya suzerains of Nannarāja-Ṇaṇṇappa.[5]

t>

TEXT[6]

[Metres : Verses 1, 4, 6 Sragdharā ; verses 2-3, 8 Śārdūlavikrīḍita ; verses 5, 7, 9-15 Anushṭubh.]

_________________________________________

[1] Above, Vol. IX, pp. 195 ff. and Plate.
[2] G. Yazdani, Ajanta, Part IV, Text, pp. 121 ff. and Plate.
[3] Arch, Surv. West. Circ., An. Rep., 1908-09, p. 49.
[4] A ruler named Nannappa, who seems to have belonged to the Rāshṭrakūṭa lineage and ruled about the close of the seventh and beginning of the eighth century, is known from the Salem plates of Gaṅga Śripurusha, dated Śaka 693 (771 A. D.). See above, Vol. XXVII, p. 147 and note 5, pp. 335-36. For an earlier ruler named Nanna who may not have been a Rāshṭrakūṭa, see The Classical Age, p. 197.─ Ed.]
[5]This is extremely doubtful. There is as yet no evidence to show that the Indragaḍh region formed a part of the dominions of the Chālukyas of Bādāmi. It is also not certain that Ṇaṇṇappa was a feudatory ruler.─ Ed.] [6] From the original stone and inked imp- [7] Expressed by symbol.

Home Page