The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Authors

Contents

D. R. Bhat

P. B. Desai

Krishna Deva

G. S. Gai

B R. Gopal & Shrinivas Ritti

V. B. Kolte

D. G. Koparkar

K. G. Krishnan

H. K. Narasimhaswami & K. G. Krishana

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam

Sadhu Ram

S. Sankaranarayanan

P. Seshadri Sastri

M. Somasekhara Sarma

D. C. Sircar

D. C. Sircar & K. G. Krishnan

D. C. Sircar & P. Seshadri Sastri

K. D. Swaminathan

N. Venkataramanayya & M. Somasekhara Sarma

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

No. 28─ GRANT OF MAHARAJAKULA JAITRASIMHADEVA, V. S. 1347

(2 Plates)

SADHU RAM, NEW DELHI

The present inscription[1] is engraved on a set of two copper plates measuring 18.5″ X 12″ each and weighing both together 497 tolas. They are preserved in the Prince of Wales Museum, Bombay. The first plate is engraved on one side only, while the second bears writing on both the sides. There are two holes, ⅝″ in diameter, along the longer side on both the plates, evidently meant for the rings to keep them together. The rings seem to have been lost.

The record is composed in Sanskrit verse and prose, of which the panegyrical portion is in verse and the documentary part in prose. The poetry is labored and highly artificial, and abounds in alliterations. The record is written in the Nāgarī script of the 13th century A. D. The execution of engraving on the first plate is better and contains fewer errors than that on the two sides of the second plate, which appears to have been done by an apprentice. As regards orthography, there is v for b except in some words. The medial vowels ē, ai, ō and au are formed with a pṛishṭha-mātrā stroke. There is a good deal of confusion between the execution of the letters n and t, y and p, m and s, etc. I have avoided to make the transcribed text cumbersome by inserting too many such corrections within brackets, and have often given the correct readings as they should have been.

t>

The record is dated in the year 1347 of the Vikrama era, which corresponds to 1290 A. D. It records of the grant of the village of Ṭakārī by Mahārājakula Jaitrasiṁhadēva to twenty-six Brāhmaṇas of the Śrīmālī caste,[2] whose names, along with the gōtra and the name of each one’s father, are given from line 33 to 44. Ṭakārī is described as situated in the jurisdiction of Nandapadra, which is probably identical with Nandapura on the bank of the Rēvā (v. 10), and was the capital of the kingdom during the reign of Vīsaladēva, the elder brother of Jaitrasiṁhadēva. The genealogy of this ruling family (rāja-vaṁśa), called Vaijavāpāyana in v. 2 and merely Vijapāyana in line 31, is given as follows :

It is rather difficult to identify this Vaijavāpāyana family. We have a reference to a Vaijavāpa gōtra in the Rasikapriyā, a commentary on Jayadēva’s Gītagōvinda by Rāṇā Kumbhakarṇa, in which Bappa (V. S. 1342), the founder of Gōhila-vaṁśa is referred to as dvija-puṁgava and belonging to the Vaijavāpa gōtra. In view of this, all that we can hazard is that this Vaijavāpāyana family may have been a branch of the same Gōhila stock.

The problem of identification is also complicated by the fact that the names occurring in this genealogy were very common among the Rājput families of that period. For instance, one

_________________________________________________

[1] The inscription was published by Shri Amrit V. Pandya in his New Dynasties of Gujarat History, 1950, pp. 15 ff. and Plates.
[2] The caste derives its name from the district of Śrīmāla and the town situated in it.

Home Page