The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Authors

Contents

D. R. Bhat

P. B. Desai

Krishna Deva

G. S. Gai

B R. Gopal & Shrinivas Ritti

V. B. Kolte

D. G. Koparkar

K. G. Krishnan

H. K. Narasimhaswami & K. G. Krishana

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam

Sadhu Ram

S. Sankaranarayanan

P. Seshadri Sastri

M. Somasekhara Sarma

D. C. Sircar

D. C. Sircar & K. G. Krishnan

D. C. Sircar & P. Seshadri Sastri

K. D. Swaminathan

N. Venkataramanayya & M. Somasekhara Sarma

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

No. 25─ FRAGMENTARY MAURYA INSCRIPTION FROM MATHURA

(1 Plate)

D. C. SIRCAR, OOTACAMUND

A fragment of an inscribed stone slab was discovered in 1954 at Katra Keshavdev within Mathurā city, headquarters of the District of that name in Uttar Pradesh. It was presented by the Shri Krishna Janmabhumi Trust, Mathurā, to the local Archaeological Museum. In April 1955, I received two impressions of the fragmentary inscription from Mr. K. D. Bajpai, Curator of the said Museum. I am thankful to Mr. Bajpai for giving me an opportunity to study the inscription which was found on examination to be of considerable historical importance.

The inscribed fragment measures 22¾ inches in height, with a small piece of stone broken away both from the top and from the bottom. The width of the stone is not uniform since it is mutilated at both the sides. The breadth of the upper part is 11 inches while that of the lower portion is only about 8 inches. There are altogether 15 lines of writing in the inscription. But a few letters are noticed in the upper left corner of the stone, although they appear to be scribbling of a slightly later date, having little to do with the original record under study. The letters of the epigraph are carefully engraved but they are not uniform in shape. As for instance, letters in line 1 are considerably smaller in size than those in lines 2-10. The letters in lines 11-15 are also somewhat smaller. The space between the lines is likewise not uniform, that between lines 1 and 2 being more than in any other case. Some letters are broken away from the beginning and end of all these lines. The major part of the record is written in verse and so the number of the lost syllables can be easily determined.

t>

The characters resemble those of such inscriptions of the seventh and eighth centuries belonging to the western parts of Northern India as the Banskhera plate[1] of Harsha (606-47 A.D.), the Kundesvar inscription[2] (V.S. 718=661 A.D.) of Aparājita, the Jhalrapatan inscription[3] (V.S. 746-689 A.D.) of Durgagaṇa, the Kudarkot inscription[4] of about the second half of the seventh century, the Nagar inscription[5] (V.S. 741=684 A.D.) of Dhanika, and the Kanaswa inscription[6] (V.S. 795=738 A.D.) of Śivagaṇa. Some of the vowel-marks and subscripts are often of the ornamental type. For the ordinary and ornamental types of the medial signs of i, ī and ē, see respectively śirō and vēshṭituṁ in line 9, śrī in lines 3 and 4, and ºānvayē in line 3 and mūlyēna in line 8, while, for subscript r, see śrī-Chandraº in line 4. The difference between the ornamental forms of medial i and medial ē is that the former is extended towards the left after a sharp curve in the middle. The form of in line 2 is interesting. In many cases, the letters d has a marked protrusion at the beck as in the modern Śāradā and Gurumukhī alphabets (cf. dyutayē in line 1, ºd=Āryāº and Chandraº in line 4, dinaṁ in line 13). In some cases, the globular limb of n is not joined with the vertical hanging from the top mātrā (e.g. in nṛipatiḥ in line 4). The letter k shows

______________________________________________

[1] Above, Vol. IV, pp. 208 ff. and Plate.
[2] Ibid., pp. 29 ff. and Plate.
[3] Ibid., Vol. V. p. 181 and Plate.
[4] Ibid., Vol. I, p. 180 ff. and Plate.
[5] Bhārata Kaumudī, Part I, pp. 267 ff. and Plate.
[6] Ind. Ant., Vol. XIX, p. 57 and Plate.

Home Page