The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Authors

Contents

D. R. Bhat

P. B. Desai

Krishna Deva

G. S. Gai

B R. Gopal & Shrinivas Ritti

V. B. Kolte

D. G. Koparkar

K. G. Krishnan

H. K. Narasimhaswami & K. G. Krishana

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam

Sadhu Ram

S. Sankaranarayanan

P. Seshadri Sastri

M. Somasekhara Sarma

D. C. Sircar

D. C. Sircar & K. G. Krishnan

D. C. Sircar & P. Seshadri Sastri

K. D. Swaminathan

N. Venkataramanayya & M. Somasekhara Sarma

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

Sultāns of Delhi dispatched against Tiling. According to Baranī, Sultān ‘ Alā-ud-dīn Khaljī planned an invasion of Tiling as early as 1301 A. D. ‘ Four or five months after the Sultān left Rantambhōr ’, says he, ‘ UlughKhān collected a large force with the intention of attacking Tiling and Ma’abar, but his time was come, and the angel of destiny took him to the blessed city. His corpse was conveyed to Delhi and buried in his own house’.[1] The expedition to Tiling did not obviously proceed. The idea was not, however, abandoned. Some two years later, ‘ at the time when the Sultān was engaged in the siege of Chitor, Malik Fakhr-ud-dīn Jūna, dadbak-i-Hazarat and Malik Jhāju of Karra, nephew of Nusrat Khān, had been sent with all the forces of Hindustan against Arangal ’. On their arrival there the rainy season began and proved such a hindrance that the army could do nothing and in the beginning of the winter returned greatly reduced in numbers, to Hindustan.[2] The expedition thus ended in disaster. Although the Muslim historians attribute the failure to the outbreak of rains, it is not unlikely that they came into condict with the Tiliṅgas and were worsted by them in the fight.

The failure of the expedition rankled in the mind of ‘ Alā-ud-dīn ; and in 1309-10 A. D., he despatched another expedition under the famous Malik Nā’īb Kāfūr and Khwāja Ḥājī, the ‘āriz-i-Mamālik. This expedition, according to the unanimous testimony of Muslim historians, was a resounding success of Muslim arms. The derails of it are far too well known to need description. The Muslim armies marched to Warangal by way of Dēvagiri without meeting serious opposition on the way ; defeated the Kākatīya forces, laid siege to and captured the outside mud fort, and invested the inner stone fort. Pratāparudra sued for peace. Malik Nā’īb Kāfūr agreed to accede to his request on condition that he surrendered all his wealth, together with his elephants and horses, jewels and valuables and promised to send every year a certain amount of treasure and a certain number of elephants by way of tribute to Delhi. Pratāparudra who had no alternative accepted the conditions and Malik Nā’īb Kāfūr raised the siege, and marched away to Delhi laden with booty.[3]

t>

Of the next invasion, which was sent from Dēvagiri in 1318 A.D. by Sultān Qutb-ud-dīn Mubārak Shāh, two conflicting accounts have come down to us. The cause of the expedition was the failure of Pratāparudra to pay the annual tribute for some years. To collect the arrears of this tribute, the Sultān sent Khusru Khān at the head of an army to Tiling. According to AmīaKhusru, Pratāparudra offered resistance, but was defeated and had to purchase peace at a very heavy price. Amīr Khusru’s account of Khusru Khān’s expedition to Tiling reads like another version of Nalik Na’īb Kāfūr’s invasion in 1310 A. D. The encounter with Pratāparudra’s forces, their defeat, the investment and capture of the mud fort, the attack on the stone fort, and Pratāparudra’s surrender of all his wealth besides elephants and horses, follow the same pattern.[4] …’lsāmy, who also describes Khusru Khān’s expedition to Tiling, narrates the events differently : he does not refer to hostilities. Pratāparudra, on the contrary, is said to have received Khusru Khān with respect, paid the tribute due to the Sultān readily and sent him back to Dēvagiri well satisfied.[5] Which of these two accounts is true is not easy to decide.

______________________________________________

[1] Elliot, History of India, Vol. III, p. 179.
[2] Ibid., p. 189, Nizām-ud-dīn Aḥmad makes a casual reference to this expedition. “The flower of the Sultān’s army had, however, marched to the extreme south of the Dakin, to conquer Arangal ’ (Tabaqat-i-Akbarī, Eng. trans., Vol. I, p. 173). Ferishta also states that owing to the absence of his army, which went on an expedition to Waranagal, ‘Alā-ud-dīn was in no condition to face the Mughal invader Targhī on equal terms (Briggs, Ferishta, Vol. I., p. 354).
[3] Ibid., p. 202-03.
[4] A few variations on doubt occur. Pratāparudra is said to have ceded five districts of his kingdom to the Sultān ; these were, however, given back excepting the fort of Badrkot (Elliot, History of India, Vol. III, pp. 558-61).
[5] Futūḥ-us-Salātīn (Madras edn.), pp. 361-63.

Home Page