The Indian Analyst

South Indian Inscriptions







Additions and Corrections



Dr. Bhandarkar

J.F. Fleet

Prof. E. Hultzsch

Prof. F. Kielhorn

Rev. F. Kittel

H. Krishna Sastri

H. Luders


V. Venkayya


List of Plates

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27





Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India



Vol. X. p. 104, No. 96, text line 2 ; the biruda has there been translated, by “ he whose glances were (as bright) as jewels.”─ J. F. F.

Page 225, line 10 from bottom,- for Eastern India, read Southern India.

” 251 ff. ; the Diḍgûr inscription.─ In editing this record, I overlooked a fact to which Professor Kielhorn has kindly drawn my attention. Just as here we have Dosi as the name of the governor of the Banavâsi province under king Kattiyara, so also we have Dosirâja as the name of the person at whose request, as recorded in the Vakkalêri plates of A.D. 757 (see Vol. V. above, p. 201), the western Chalukya king Kîrtivarman II. granted the village of Suḷḷiyûr, which was in the Pânuṁgal vishaya and consequently in the Banavâsi province. The Dosi of the Diḍgûr inscription may well have been a grandson of the Dosirâja of the Vakkalêri plates. At any rate, the identity of these two names Dosi and Dosirâja, and their connection with the same part of the country is another point in favour of the view that Kattiyara was a Chalukya.─ J. F. F.

” 286, line 20 f. from bottom.─ Professor Kielhorn contributes the following remark on this date :─ “ For Śaka-Saṁvat 789 expired it corresponds to the 23rd December A.D. 867. On this day the 9th tithi of the dark half of Pausha ended 12 h. 3 m. after mean sunrise, and the Uttarâyaṇa-Saṁkrânti took place during the same tithi, 1 h. 10 m. before mean sunrise.”

” 286, line 18 ff. from bottom.─ In Ind. Ant. Vol. XXXI. p. 254 f. Dr. Fleet has shewn that Kâmpilya, Chokkhakuṭi, Dabbhellaṅka (this is the correct reading), Apasundara and Kâlûpallikâ corresponded to the modern villages Kaphleta, Chokhad, Dabhel, Asundar and Karoli, and that the river Mandâkinî is now called Mindhola.

” 321, line 15 from bottom,─ for Kaśâkûḍi, read Kâśâkuḍi.
” 324, note 1, line 4 f., and page 325, line 5,─for Ommaṇa-Uḍaiyar, read Jammaṇa- Uḍaiyar.
” 327, line 23,─ for -Udaiya[r*]. read –Uḍaiya[r*].

Home Page