|
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
interesting fact that some of the dates do work out for precisely the period, the eleventh century
A.D., which, as will be shewn, best provided all the historical conditions that necessitated
the production of forged title-deeds to regain the possession of genuine endowments which
had been confiscated and of which the original title-deeds had been lost, and made it possible to
produce forged title-deeds to secure endowments the claims to which were false. And, before
dealing with the matter finally, we shall have to consider which of the spurious records
may really be accepted as ancient forgeries, worth examination, and which of them,─ notably,
for instance, the extraordinary Harihar grant,[1] which presents an attempt at two, if not three,
alphabets, including some of the most modern Nâgarî or Bâlbôdh forms,─ may have to be
rejected as modern forgeries, like the Suradhênupura document, and consequently to be
dismissed as not worth any further thought. All this will take time. And in this line
there is no particular objection to delay : partly in order to include in the final examination as
many of these documents as can be brought together ; and partly because, in view of what
we learn from the Suradhênupura forgery can be attempted even in the present day, there is
no particular object in compiling too quickly a manual of hints which would enable a modern
forger to concoct a document that might prove not so easy to deal with as the ancient forgeries.
In connection with both lines of inquiry, there are two questions of more immediate
urgency. One is the duration and extent of the Chôḷa occupation of Mysore, and of some
of the neighbouring parts of the Western Châlukya territories, during the eleventh century
A.D., which, in consequence of the destruction of temples and the confiscation of endowments,
created the chief reason for the production of the forgeries of the Western Gaṅga series ;
and, in connection with this, I shall edit in full an interesting record at Gâwarawâḍ in the
Dhârwâr district,[2] with extracts from others connected with it. The other is the development
of the alphabet of the Kanarese country during the ninth century A.D. : this will be
of use, not only towards exposing fully the palæographic blunders of the ancient forgers,
but also for arranging the proper order of genuine undated records not containing information
that enables us to refer them to their exact places ; and it will be illustrated, in the
first instance, by a series of Râshṭrakûṭa records, collotypes of which have already been
prepared.
* * * * * *
The two preliminary studies, indicated just above, will be published without much delay.
Meanwhile, I am under the necessity of using such further space, as can be spared to me on
the present occasion, chiefly in noticing, as briefly as possible, some remarks by Mr. Rice which are contained in his Ep. Carn. Vol. IV. Introd. pp. 6 to 8, and are by way of being a
criticism of my exposé of the spurious grants in Vol. III. of this Journal, pp. 159 to 175.
We need not spend any time over Mr. Rice’s opening assertion that “ facts have proved
“ too strong, and Dr. Fleet has been compelled to admit the existence of the kings from
“ Śivamâra, in the 8th century, downwards, and perhaps Mushkara, two generations earlier.”
The assertion has been made carelessly, and without sufficient reflection. I have never made
the alleged admissions. And nothing has ever yet been brought to light, that would justify
me in making any such admissions.
Nor need we spend any time over the bad orthography of the grants,─ over Viśvakarman, the alleged writer (not engraver) of some of the grants which purport to be
centuries apart in date,─ over the identity of the witnesses in two of the grants which purport
to be separated by an interval of two hundred and eighteen years,─ over a conjectural
_____________________________________________________
[1] Ind. Ant. Vol. VII. p. 173, with a lithograph.
[2] Noticed in Dyn. Kan. Distrs. p. 441, note 3. I find that this record contains much more information
than I thought from a cursory examination, made when I was writing my Dynasties in the leisure moments of
official life, of the transcriptions of it and the Aṇṇigere inscription in Sir Walter Elliotâs collection.
|