Contents |
Index
|
Introduction
|
Contents
|
List of Plates
|
Additions and Corrections
|
Images
|
Contents |
Chaudhury, P.D.
|
Chhabra, B.ch.
|
DE, S. C.
|
Desai, P. B.
|
Dikshit, M. G.
|
Krishnan, K. G.
|
Desai, P. B
|
Krishna Rao, B. V.
|
Lakshminarayan Rao, N., M.A.
|
Mirashi, V. V.
|
Narasimhaswami, H. K.
|
Pandeya, L. P.,
|
Sircar, D. C.
|
Venkataramayya, M., M.A.,
|
Venkataramanayya, N., M.A.
|
Index-By A. N. Lahiri
|
Other
South-Indian Inscriptions
|
Volume
1
|
Volume
2
|
Volume
3
|
Vol.
4 - 8
|
Volume 9
|
Volume 10
|
Volume 11
|
Volume 12
|
Volume 13
|
Volume
14
|
Volume 15
|
Volume 16
|
Volume 17
|
Volume 18
|
Volume
19
|
Volume
20
|
Volume 22 Part 1
|
Volume
22 Part 2
|
Volume
23
|
Volume
24 |
Volume
26
|
Volume 27 |
Tiruvarur
|
Darasuram
|
Konerirajapuram
|
Tanjavur |
Annual Reports 1935-1944
|
Annual Reports 1945- 1947
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
|
Epigraphica Indica
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32
|
Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
|
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2
|
Vākāṭakas Volume 5
|
Early Gupta Inscriptions
|
Archaeological
Links
|
Archaeological-Survey
of India
|
Pudukkottai
|
|
|
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
The importance of the epigraph lies in its being unique. Inscriptions mentioning the joint
rule of the two brothers, Śivachitta Permāḍi and Vijayāditya II, and also those that refer to the
rule of the former only who was the elder of the two, have been discovered. But no inscription
referring to Vijayāditya as an independent ruler, has come to light so far. No doubt the second
part of the Halsi inscription contains a reference to the regnal year possibly of Vijayāditya ; but
it is clear from the earlier portion that his brother Permāḍi was ruling at the time.1 Hence the
present happens to be the first and the only inscription so far discovered, attributing independent
rule to Vijayāditya, dissociated from his brother. The reason for this appears to be that
Permāḍi was no longer living by this time.2 According to the Halsi inscription, Vijayāditya
was a devotee of the god Vishṇu and bore the epithet Vishṇuchitta. But it is revealed from the
seal of the present plates that he preferred to describe himself as Vishṇudāsa, i. e., ‘an humble
servant of Lord Vishṇu.’
The inscription contains two place-names. One is the region called Marruvaṭṭugaḍalu or
Maruvaṭṭugaḍalu, and the other the village Aruvige situated therein. It is interesting to note
that Maruvaṭṭugaḍalu is a purely Kannaḍa expression made up of the words maru, paṭṭu or maṭṭu
and kaḍalu. It means ‘the coastal region adjoining the sea.’ I am, however, unable to identify
this tract. Aruvige appears to be identical with the present day Arage, a village about 4 miles to
the south-east of Karwar, on the road to Ankola. The village Arage contains a shrine dedicated
to a female deity named Durgā. This deity probably represents the goddess Āryā Bhagavati of
the epigraph.
TEXT3
[Metres : Verses 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 13 Śārdūlavikrīḍita ; vv. 3, 7 Upajāti ; vv. 4, 8, 9, 14-18
Anushṭubh ; v. 11 Mandākrāntā ; v. 12 Vasantatilakā.]
First Plate

_________________________________________________
[1] J. B. B. R. A. S., Vol. IX, pp. 279-80 ; compare George M. Moraes, Kadamba Kula, p. 199.
[2] Compare Kadamba Kula, p. 201.
[3] From the original plates and impressions.
[4] In this and a few more instances that follow, the final m is changed to anusvāra.
|