The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Chaudhury, P.D.

Chhabra, B.ch.

DE, S. C.

Desai, P. B.

Dikshit, M. G.

Krishnan, K. G.

Desai, P. B

Krishna Rao, B. V.

Lakshminarayan Rao, N., M.A.

Mirashi, V. V.

Narasimhaswami, H. K.

Pandeya, L. P.,

Sircar, D. C.

Venkataramayya, M., M.A.,

Venkataramanayya, N., M.A.

Index-By A. N. Lahiri

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

BILAIGARH PLATES OF KALACHURI PRATAPAMALLA ;
YEAR 969



TEXT[1]

[Metres : Vv. 1, 7, 9, 11, 15-16, 19, 21-29 Anushṭubh ; vv. 2, 5, 14 Upajāti ; vv. 3, 12 Sragdharā ; vv. 4, 6, 30 Vasantatilakā ; v. 8 Mālinī ; vv. 10, 17 Śikhariṇī ; vv. 13, 18, 20 Śārdūlavikrīḍita.]

_________________________________________________


[1] From the original plates and inked impressions.
[2] Expressed by a symbol.
[3] There appears to be an anusvāra on this letter ; but this and a few other dots elsewhere have to be ignored, as they are apparently due to the defect in the metal.
[4] This ru is not properly engraved ; it may be compared with other rus in the inscription, e.g., lines 8 and 11.
[5] There is a scored-out sign for medial i before the letter sya.
[6] This danḍa is superfluous. By inserting this punctuation mark, the scribe possibly meant that the first quarter of the verse ended with the word jātāḥ. This is wrong, as it ends with kau.
[7] This is clearly lla , compare lla of Kōkalla in 1. 5. The intended akshara was perhaps ṛṇṇa which is however wrong for rnna. See above, Vol. XXIII, p. 4, n. 2.
[8] The word kuṁbha is followed by the two scored-out syllables vibha.
[9] The form anūja is wrongly used for anuja for the sake of metre.

Home Page

>
>