The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Chaudhury, P.D.

Chhabra, B.ch.

DE, S. C.

Desai, P. B.

Dikshit, M. G.

Krishnan, K. G.

Desai, P. B

Krishna Rao, B. V.

Lakshminarayan Rao, N., M.A.

Mirashi, V. V.

Narasimhaswami, H. K.

Pandeya, L. P.,

Sircar, D. C.

Venkataramayya, M., M.A.,

Venkataramanayya, N., M.A.

Index-By A. N. Lahiri

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

His son Rājēndra I (1016-43 A.C.) also claims to have defeated the Eastern Chālukya king as well as to have set up pillars of victory on Mount Mahēndra in Kaliṅga (in the present Srikakulam District of Madras). Whether, however, this achievement of Rājēndra I should be attributed to his own reign or to that of his father when he may have led the expedition against the Kaliṅga country as his father’s general is uncertain in the present state of our knowledge. But it is extremely interesting to note that, in the description of the expeditions led by the generals or Rājēndra I about 1023 A.C. in the countries towards the east as far as South-East Bengal, mention is made of the reduction of Oḍra (Puri-Cuttack area) and Kōsala (the Sambalpur region together with certain western tracts), both then under the Sōmavaṁśī king of Yayātinagara,[1] but not of any conflict with the king of Kaliṅga.[2] This fact seems to suggest that the early rulers of the imperial Gaṅga family were regarded by the Chōḷa emperors as their subordinate allies. The real founder of the greatness of the imperial branch of the Gaṅga family was another Vajrahasta Anantavarman (1038-70 A.C.) who was the grandson of his namesake mentioned above and the grandfather of the mighty Anantavarman Chōḍagaṅga. But Chōḷa influence continued in Kaliṅga as late as the reign of Chōḍagaṅga and even later.

The present inscription is one of the few records of Anantavarman Chōḍagaṅga that have been so far discovered in the Puri-Cuttack region which was conquered by that monarch from the Sōmavaṁśīs about the beginning of the twelfth century.

Of the geographical names mentioned in the inscription, the location of Chōḷa-dēśa has already been noticed. Kaḍamvura may, as Mr. N. L. Rao has kindly suggested be identified with Kaḍambūr in the Udaiyarpalaiyam taluk of the Tiruchirapalli District. Alaguṁma is no doubt modern Alagum which is the findspot of the inscription under discussion. The name is Alaguma even now in Oriya pronunciation. The vishaya or district of Rāmaṅga, in which the village of Alaguṁma is said to have been situated, seems to be the same as the Rāvaṅga vishaya mentioned in the Puri plates of Bhānu II.[3]

>

TEXT[4]

1 Siddham[5] Svasti [||*] Śrīmad-Anantavarmadēvasya
2 pravarddhamāna-vijaya-rājyē ||[6] dvāshashṭhi(shṭa)-
3 samva(saṁva)tsarē Māgha-śi(si)ta-tithau sapta-
4 myāṁ vārē Gurau Chōla-dēsa(śa)-prati-
5 va(ba)ddha-Kaḍamvura-grāma-vinirggata-Kāsya(śya)-
6 pa-gōtra-pañch-ārsha(rshē)ya-pravara-pitāma-
7 ha-Pōtāṇḍi[ḥ*] tat-putra-Bhīmāṇḍi[ḥ*] tad-vans-ō(d-vaṁś-ō)-
8 dbhava-paramamāhēsva(śva)ra-paramavaishna(shṇa)va-
9 disāpati[7]-Kāmāṇḍi-nāmā khyātaḥ ||[6]
10 idānīṁ Rāmaṅga-vishaya-prativa(ba)ddha[8]-Ala-
11 guṁma-grāmīya-Kapālēsva(śva)ra-nāma-bhūmi-ha-
12 l-aikaṁ sādhu-prajā-lōka(kā)n pramukhīkṛi-
13 tya sva-dhanēna krītvā=’śēsha-dharmma-viva(vṛi)-
14 ddhayē śrī-Garttēsva(śva)radēvasya maṭha-prativa(ba)-

_________________________________________________

[1] See I. H. Q., Vol. XXII, pp. 300 ff.
[2] Ray, op. cit., pp. 318 ff. ; above, Vol. IX, pp. 220 ff.
[3] See J. R. A. S. B., Letters, Vol. XVII, pp. 19-26.
[4] From impressions.
[5] Expressed by a symbol.
[6] The daṇḍas are superfluous.
[7] Possibly diśāmpati.
[8] The rule of sandhi has not been observed here.

Home Page

>
>