Contents |
Index
|
Introduction
|
Contents
|
List of Plates
|
Additions and Corrections
|
Images
|
Contents |
Chaudhury, P.D.
|
Chhabra, B.ch.
|
DE, S. C.
|
Desai, P. B.
|
Dikshit, M. G.
|
Krishnan, K. G.
|
Desai, P. B
|
Krishna Rao, B. V.
|
Lakshminarayan Rao, N., M.A.
|
Mirashi, V. V.
|
Narasimhaswami, H. K.
|
Pandeya, L. P.,
|
Sircar, D. C.
|
Venkataramayya, M., M.A.,
|
Venkataramanayya, N., M.A.
|
Index-By A. N. Lahiri
|
Other
South-Indian Inscriptions
|
Volume
1
|
Volume
2
|
Volume
3
|
Vol.
4 - 8
|
Volume 9
|
Volume 10
|
Volume 11
|
Volume 12
|
Volume 13
|
Volume
14
|
Volume 15
|
Volume 16
|
Volume 17
|
Volume 18
|
Volume
19
|
Volume
20
|
Volume 22 Part 1
|
Volume
22 Part 2
|
Volume
23
|
Volume
24 |
Volume
26
|
Volume 27 |
Tiruvarur
|
Darasuram
|
Konerirajapuram
|
Tanjavur |
Annual Reports 1935-1944
|
Annual Reports 1945- 1947
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2
|
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1
|
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
|
Epigraphica Indica
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
|
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32
|
Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
|
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2
|
Vākāṭakas Volume 5
|
Early Gupta Inscriptions
|
Archaeological
Links
|
Archaeological-Survey
of India
|
Pudukkottai
|
|
|
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
as I have demonstrated elsewhere,[1] it refers to the usual conventional claim of dig-vijaya over the
chakravarti-kshētra covering the whole of India. That the claim has not much history behind
it is clear from the fact that the same verse, describing the exploits of Mahīpāla’s forces in the
present record, has been employed in the Bāṇgarh plate of the same king to eulogize the achievements of the army of the king’s father Vigrahapāla II. Again, the same verse is also found in the
Jājilpārā plate of Gōpāla II as well as the Āmgāchhi[2] and Belwā plates of Vigrahapāla III
(grandson of Mahīpāla I) in the description of the exploits of the armies of the reigning monarchs.
Lines 23-27 of the charter introduce the place of issue which was the jaya-skandhāvāra at the
city of Sāhasagaṇḍa. It is interesting to note that the same description is employed in all the
Pāla charters, beginning with those of Dharmapāla, although the jaya-skandhāvāras (probably
temporary capitals) themselves were different. This stereotyped description suits only a city on
the Bhāgīrathī (i.e., the Ganges) and it suggests that the various jaya-skandhāvāras, some of which
cannot be satisfactorily indentified, were all situated on the Ganges.[3] This is supported by the
fact that most of the grants were made by the Pāla kings after taking a bath in the waters of the
Ganges. Lines 27-28 introduce the reigning monarch, who was in good health while making the
grant, as the Paramasaugata (devout Buddhist) Paramēśvara Paramabhaṭṭāraka Mahārājādhirāja
Mahīpāladēvawho meditated on (or was favoured by) the feet of the Mahārājādhirāja Vigrahapāldēva.
Lines 28-31 give details regarding the gift land which consisted of three localities all situated in
the Puṇḍravardhana bhukti. The first of the three was Ōsinna-Kaivarttavṛitti which measured 210
and was attached to the territorial unit called Amalakshudduṅga within the Phāṇita vīthī. The
expression sva-sambaddh-āvichchhinna-tal-ōpēta (i.e., ‘ land that pertains to the king’s own self
and has its ground not yet alienated’), found in the description of the piece of land, is also known
from other Pāla charters. The standard land measure, according to which the area of Ōsinna-Kaivarttavṛitti was calculated to have been 210, has not been specified. The Belwā plate of Vigrahapāla III, edited below, speaks of the land measures udamāna, āḍhavāpa, drōṇa (i.e.,
drōṇavāpa) and kulya (i.e., kulyavāpa) as prevalent in the same locality. Of these, 4 āḍhavāpas
made 1 drōṇa, 8 of which were equal to 1 kulya. As I have shown elsewhere,4 about 45 udamānas
(otherwise called udāna or unmāna) probably made an āḍhavāpa (originally from 4 to 5 modern
Bengal Bighās of land). It is difficult to determine as to which of the four land measures has been
regarded as the standard one in the record under discussion, especially in view of the fact that all
the four are known to have been the standard land measure in different localities, although the
area of each may not have been the same in all places. The high number in the specification of
the area suggests that the reference is possibly not to the kulya or kulyavāpa.
The second piece of the gift land comprised the locality called Nadisvāminī which measured
490 of the standard land measure and was situated in Shaṭṭāpāṇāyichatra which incorporated
Pañchakāṇḍaka and lay in the Puṇḍarikā maṇḍala. The third plot of the gift land was the locality
called Gaṇēśvara to which some village tanks were attached. The area of this plot was 151 or
the standard land measure and it was situated in the Pañchanagarī vishaya.
_________________________________________________
[1] J. R. A. S. B., L., Vol. V, pp. 407-15, especially p. 410.
[2] Above, Vol. XV, 295 ff.
[3] The following jaya-skandhāvāras are known to have been places of issue of the Pāla charters : Pāṭaliputra
(near modern Patna), Mudgagiri (modern Monghyr), Rāmāvatī (near modern Gaur in the Malda District), Vaṭaparvataka (modern Vaṭēśvar-parvat near Pātharghāṭā in the Bhāgalpur District), Vilāsapura and Sāhasagaṇḍa.
The name of the place, whence the Āmgāchhi plate of Vigrahapāla III was issued, is doubtful ; but to me it appears
to be Vilāsapura.
[4] I.H.Q., Vol. XXVI, pp. 309-13.
|