The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Introduction

Epigraphia Indica

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

ALAMANDA PLATES OF ANANTAVARMAN.


......The inscription records the gift of the village of Mede[lâ]ka in the Tirikaṭu-vishaya (line 13 f.) to a Brâhmaṇa of the Vâjasanêya school (l. 16). The grant was made at Kaliṅgânagara1 (l. 2) on the day of a solar eclipse (l. 18) in “the three-hundred-and-fourth year of the reign of the G[â]ṅgêya race” (l. 28 f.). The donor was king Anantavarman, the son of the Mahârâja Râjêndravarman, a member of the Gaṅga family (l. 12 f.) and a worshipper of Mahêśvara (l. 11). The wording of the passage which celebrates the virtues of the king (ll. 1 to 12), is identical with that of the corresponding passage in a copper-plate grant of Dêvêndravarman, the son of the Mahârâja Anantavarman.2 As Dr. Fleet has expressed his intention of treating the chronology of the Gaṅgas of Kaliṅga,3 I refrain from attempting any conjectures regarding the date of the new inscription, and would only point out that it appears to refer to the same era as the grant of the year 254,4 and that, consequently, the king Anantavarman, by whom the subjoined grant was issued, appears to be distinct from, and later than, another Anantavarman, who was the father of Dêvêndravarman.

>

TEXT.5


_________________________________________________________________

......1 This is probably the modern “Calingapatam ;” Ind. Ant. Vol. XVIII. p. 144, Mr. Sewell’s Lists of Antiquities, Vol. I. p. 7.
......2 Published by Dr. Fleet, Ind. Ant. Vol. XIII. pp. 273 ff.
......3 Ind. Ant. Vol. XVIII. p. 1444.

 

>
>