The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

The characters and Proto-Bengali of the 11th century A.D. The most notable letter from the point of view of palæography is r which still retains its hooked form and is not yet a complete triangle. In the plate of Sāmalavarman, edited below, as well as in the Belāva plate of Bhōjavarman, r is a complete and well-formed triangle. The language is Sanskrit.

The history of the Varman kings of Vaṅga was for the first time placed on a sure footing by the discovery and publication of the Belāva plate of Bhōjavarman, although Harivarmadēva was known to scholars from the Bhubaneswar inscription[1] of his minister, Bhaṭṭa Bhavadēva. The family traced its descent from the Moon and belonged to the Yādava clan, which had made Siṁhapura its home. This city has been variously located ; but none of the suggestions can be regarded as conclusive in the absence of any definite pointer. Nevertheless its identification with Siṁhapura in Kaliṅga may be accepted for all practical purposes.[2]

When the armies of Rājēndra Chōḷa led an expedition against Bengal about 1023-24 A.D.,[3] they found on the throne of East Bengali (Vaṅgāla) a king called Gōvindachandra apparently belonging to the Chandra dynasty of Vikramapura. This is corroborated by a statement in the life of Dīpaṅkara-Śrījñāna-Atiśa, complied by the late Mr. Sarat Chandra Dās from Tibetan sources.[4] According to this work, Dīpaṅkara was a contemporary of the king Bhū-indra-chandra of Baṅgāla. The adult life of Dīpaṅkara, as gathered from this source, seems to have fallen between 1000 and 1022 A. D. ; and it may be assumed that Bhū-indra-chandra was the ruler of Baṅgāla during this period. The Tibetans seem to have rendered the name Gōvindachandra as Gō-indra-chandra, and substituting bhū for its equivalent , we get the modified Tibetan appellation Bhū-indra-chandra.

Hence the reign of Gōvindachandra in Vaṅgāla is to be referred to the first quarter of the 11th century A.D. But, in the next quarter, we find the Varmans established in the same kingdom and issuing copper-plate grants from the same capital, as is evidenced by the Belāva plate and by the two copper-plates edited below. Thus the Chandras appear to have been supplanted in Vaṅga by the Varmans not long after the Chōḷa raids in 1023-24 A.D.

>

As indicated above, we learn from the Belāva plate that the Yādavas of the lunar race settled at Siṁhapura and that the Varman family of Yādava lineage rose to prominence during the time of Jātavarman who is credited with many achievements. He is said to have frustrated the might of Gōvardhana who appears to be the same as Gōvardhana of Kauśāmbī, mentioned in the Rāmacharita as an ally of Rāmapāla. Kauśāmbī, was the tract east of the Bhāgīrathī and south of modern Calcutta.[5] The Varman kingdom thus spread up to the Bhāgīrathī on the west, while on its east was the Meghnā. Jātavarman became a paramount sovereign. Jāta’s son was Sāmala, born of Vīraśrī. Sāmala married Trilōkyasundarī alias Mālavyadēvī who was the daughter of Jagaddēva, son of Paramāra Udayāditya, king of Mālwā and rival of Kalachuri Karṇa. Sāmala’s son was Bhōja, in whose 5th regnal year the Belāva grant was issued. From verse 14 of this grant it would appear that the king was probably a minor at the time, and that an invasion from an enemy was apprehended. It may be noted here that Harivarman does not find mention in this record, though he is clearly hinted at in the statement that Vīraśrī and Hari many times manifested themselves in person in this dynasty (verse 3).

Harivarman is known to have enjoyed a fairly long reign. Two dated manuscripts of the reign of this king are known. One[6] of them, at present preserved in the V. R. Museum of

_____________________________________________

[1] Above, Vol. VI, pp. 198 ff.
[2] Ibid., Vol. XII, p. 4.
[3] Ibid., Vol. XXVII, p. 24.
[4] Journ. P. T. Soc., Vol. I, p. 7 n.
[5] JRAS, 1935, pp. 82-83. [The identification is not beyond doubt.─Ed.]
[6] R. D. Banerji, The Pālas of Bengal (Mem. A. S. B., Vol. V. No. 3.), Plate XXXVI.

Home Page

>
>