The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

Rāshāhī, is clearly dated in the 19th year of his reign. The other manuscript belongs to the Asiatic Society of Bengal. The late Mahāmahōpādhyāya Haraprasād Śāstrī published an illustration of the dated page of this manuscript in the journal of the Vaṅgīya Sāhitya Parishat of Calcutta.[1] Śāstrī read the date as the 39th year ; but a close examination of the illustration under a lens tends to show that the date is 32. Thus Harivarman is to be credited with a reign of at least 32 years.[2]

The name of the donee of the grant is unfortunately damaged by a crack in the plate which runs right across the name. He is stated to have served as the Śāntivārika (sprayer of propitiatory sacred water) to the king. His gōtra was Vatsa with the usual fiv pravaras, and he belonged to the Āśvalāyana branch of the Ṛigvēda. His father was Padmanābha and grandfather Vēdagarbha. His great-grandfather’s name is rather obscure and reads like Jayarakshita. As the Vatsa gōtra is to be met with among all the three prominent sections of Bengal Brāhmaṇas, viz., Rāḍhīya, Vārēndra and Vaidika, it is difficult to say to which section the donee belonged.

The land granted measured 86 drōṇas[3] of the cultivable type. It lay in the village of Vara-parvvata in the Mayūraviḍja[4] vishaya in Pañchavāsa[4]-maṇḍala within the Pauṇḍra bhukti. The bhukti of Pauṇḍravardhara is well-known. I am unable to locate the village granted. The inscription is undated and does not bear the usual endorsements at the end.

>

TEXT

Obverse

1 to 26 (damaged)

Reverse

______________________________________________

[1] Vaṅgīya Sāhitya Parishat Patrikā, Vol. XXVII, illustration No. 3.
[2] [There is some evidence to suggest that Harivarman ruled for 46 years. See History of Bengal, Dacca University, Vol. I, p. 201, note 1. Verse 16 of Bhavadēva’s praśasti seems to refer to a son of Harivarman as his successor ; cf. Ind. Cult., Vol. VII, p. 414 and note.─Ed.]
[3] [The text gives : 1 hala, 6, drōṇas and 80 of a smaller unit, the name of which is doubtful.─Ed.]
[4] [The reading of the letters is doubtful─Ed.]
[5] [Saṁ stands for sambaddha.─Ed.]
[6] [The above reading of the two aksharas seems to be wrong. The word used here certainly indicated a subdivision of the drōṇa.─Ed.]

Home Page

>
>