The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

year with 699-700 A.C. At this time a Vāṇarāja was governing the Vaṅganūr vishaya. The object of the epigraph is to record a gift of eighty units of cultivable land as pannāsa in the village Peṇukaparuti by Pūllamukki Bōḷakaṇamayāru. It was made with due ceremony after the announcement of the royal order to the effect in the presence of Chappiḷirāja and the residents of two villages. The donee who received the gift was Kumāraśarman of the Bhāradvāja gōtra.

The primary interest of the epigraph lies in the fact that it is one of the few records belonging to the early part of Vijayāditya’s reign. Furthermore, it is the earliest dated inscription of the king so far discovered in the Telugu country. Besides, it also affords a glimpse into the political condition of the Āndhra dēśa under the Chālukyas of Bādāmi and their feudatories of the Bāṇa extraction. From the provenance of the inscriptions discovered in parts of the Districts of Cuddapaḥ, Kurnool and Anantapur and further as far as Nellore,[1] it is gathered that the authority of these Chālukya rulers extended over a large portion of the Āndhra country. The major part of this territorial acquisition appears to have been effected by Pulakēśin II in the course of his triumphant expeditions in the eastern and the southern quarters.[2] Highly interesting in this context is the information furnished by an inscription from Peddavaḍugūru[3] in the Gooty taluk of the Anantapur District, which has been assigned to the time of Pulakēśin II. The epigraph seems to indicate that the chiefs of the Bāṇa family were ruling in this area in a semi-independent position before the advent of the Chālukya conqueror who vanquished them and reduced them to subordination. Ever since that time the Bāṇas seem to have accepted the suzerainty of the Chālukyas and served them as their loyal vassals.[4]

The name of the Bāṇa chief who is said to be administering the area of the Vaṅganūr vishaya, apparently as a subordinate of Vijayāditya, is not specified in our record. From an inscription at Koṇḍupalli[5] in the Gooty taluk of the Anantapur District, dated the 23rd year of Vijayāditya, we know that Vikramāditya Bali Indra Bāṇarāja was governing the Turumara vishaya. It is probable that Vāṇarāja or Bāṇarāja of our epigraph is identical with the Bāṇa chief of the Koṇḍupalli inscription. But considering the diversity if regions under the authority of these chiefs and also the interval of nearly 20 years between the dates of these records, the possibility that the two might be different, though members of the same family, is not ruled out. Chappiḷirāja, in whose presence the gift was made, appears to have been a local authority of some importance. The record was incised by Kañchagāla.

>

As for the place-names, the Vaṅganūr vishaya may be identified with the region roundabout the present-day village Vaṅganūru in the Tadpatri taluk.[6] The village Peṇukaparuti or Peṇukaparu containing the gift land might have been situated near the present-day Kottūru. The same village appears to have been referred to as Penukalapāḍu in a late inscription of the place, dated in 1514 A.C.[7] It seems to have been wiped out of existence subsequently.[8]

______________________________________________________

[1] Madras Epigraphical Reports, 1904, para. 16 ; 1906, para. 40 ; 1921, paras. 1-2 ; 1934, para. 2.
[2] Compare Journal of Indian History, Vol. XXIX (1951), pp. 161-62.
[3] SII, Vol. IX, pt. I. No. 46.
[4] Compare Journal of Indian History (op. cit), p. 162. We may incidentally note that a family of chiefs who called themselves ‘the Bāṇas of Khāṇḍavamaṇḍala ’ has been discovered by the author during his explorations in the Hyderabad State. They were ruling as the feudatories of the Chālukyas of Kalyāṇa in the 11th and 12th centuries in the vicinity of Maḷkhēḍ in the Gulbarga District ; see Journal of Oriental Research, Vol. XXI, pp. 98 ff. It is of interest also to note that a princess of the Hebbāṇa or Perbāṇa family, by name Dēvalabbe, figures as a donor in an inscription at Lakkuṇḍi, Gadag taluk, Dharwar District ; B. K. Coll., No. 47 of 1926-27.
[5] SII., Vol. X, No. 23.
[6] Vaṅganūru has yielded two inscriptions of later times, one of the Vijayanagara king Vijaya-Bukkamahārāya and another of Śaka 1429, Prabhava (=1507 A.C.) ; ARIE for 1950-51, Appendix B, Nos. 202 and 201 respectively.
[7] Ibid., for 1947-48, Appendix B, No. 13.
[8] It is worthy of note that all the antiquities of the place were found near modern Kottūru only.

Home Page

>
>