The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

were apparently engraved later than the main document. The signature of the ruler, responsible for the main record, forming its last line, looks rather like a continuation of the first line of the endorsement. The letters of the document are very carefully and beautifully incised and are about ·2″ in height. The plates appear to have been in a fairly satisfactory state of preservation when the impressions were prepared.

The inscription is if great interest from the palaeographical point of view. The characters employed belong to the West Indian variety of the Southern Alphabet and resemble those used in such epigraphs as the Sunaokala plates of Mahāsāmanta-Mahārāja Saṅgamasiṁha (Kalachuri year 292=540 A.D.),[1] the Sankheda-Mankani plates of the Kalachuri year 346 (594 A.D.)[2], the Palitana plates of Sāmanta-Mahārāja Siṁhāditya of the Gārulaka family (Gupta-Valabhī year 255=574 A.D.)[3] and the inscriptions of the Katachchuris (Kalachuris) of the sixth and seventh centuries[4] as well as of the early members of the Gurjara family of Nāndīpurī and the Maitraka family of Valabhī. On palaeographical grounds, the inscription under discussion has to be referred to the sixth or seventh century and to a locality not far from the Gujarat-Kathiawar region. These suggestions are supported by the internal evidence of the document which we shall take up presently for discussion (cf. also the nature of the plates already discussed above). The inscription employs the initial vowels a (lines 5, 7, 10-13, 15-17, 20, 23), ā (lines 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 18, 24), i (line 20), u (lines 4, 8, 12, 15), ṛi (line 9) and ē (line 34). The akshara i is formed by three dots as in the older records and ṛi (line 9), the occurrence of which is rather rare in inscriptions, shows a slightly developed form than in the Andhau inscriptions of 150 A.D.[5]

>

Final forms of the consonants (line 24), t (lines 9-10, 15-16, 20, 24-25) and m (line 16) are found in the record. The form of subscript in the conjunct rṇṇa is interesting (cf. lines 5, 15, 18, 25, 29). That b and v are indicated by two distinct letters is interesting in view of the fact that, about the age to which our record belongs, b came to be often written by the sign for v in the eastern parts of India.[6] The upadhmānīya is used once in line 7 and the jihvāmūlīya twice in lines 28 and 32. Punctuation is often indicated by a dot (lines 4-5, 7-8, 10-11, 13, 19, 23, 25-26), but in a few cases also by a small vertical or horizontal stroke (cf. lines 8, 14, 16) or a small curve (cf. the mark before the representation of the ruler’s signature in line 31). Full-stop is indicated by two daṇḍas followed by a dash (line 31), the latter being joined in one case to the foot of the second daṇḍa (line 30). That the endorsement in the last tree lines of the inscription is later than the main document is not only suggested by the date and internal evidence, as will be shown below, but also by the form of subscript th which is more developed than in the main record. The inscription employs symbols for the numbers 1 (lines 22, 23), 2 (lines 17-18, 20-21), 3 (line 20), 5 (line 22, 30), 6 (line 24), 7 (line 34), 8 (line 15), 9 (line 30), 10 (line 21), 30 (line 20), 40 (line 30), 50 (line 34), 100 (line 15), 300 (line 34) and 600 (line 30). The symbol for 40 is of the dental sibilant type. But what is of remarkable interest is that the inscription employs the symbol for ½ in two cases (lines 17, 22) and that for ¼ for no less than eleven times (lines 20, 22-24, 26-27).

The knowledge of fractions has been traced back, with reference to India, to very early times.[7] The words ardha (one-half) and tri-pāda (three-fourths) occur in the Ṛigvēda (X, 90, 4). The Maitrāyaṇī Saṁhitā (III, 7, 7) mentions kalā (one-sixteenth), kushṭha (one-twelfth), śapha (one-

_________________________________________________

[1] Above, Vol. X, pp. 74 f
[2] Ibid., Vol. II, p. 20 ; Important Inscriptions from the Baroda State, Vol. I, pp. 4 ff. I do not think that there is any evidence against the genuineness of this record.
[3] Above, Vol. XI, pp. 17-18.
[4] Cf. Bhandarkar’s List, Nos. 1206-08.
[5] Above, Vol. XVI, pp. 24 f. ; Select Inscriptions, Vol. I, pp. 167 ff.
[6] Cf. Select Inscriptions, Vol. I, p. 265, n. 7 ; p. 360, n. 8 etc.
[7] Datta and Singh, History of Hindu Mathematics, Part I, pp. 185 f.

Home Page

>
>