The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

eighth) and pāda (one-fourth). The Sulba-sūtra,[1] regarded as one of the earliest known mathematical works, not only mentions fractions but actually uses them in the statement and solution of problems. Nothing, however, is known as to how the Indians wrote the fraction in figures or symbols in the ages represented by those works. It is well known that early Indian epigraphs used two different systems of writing numerals, viz. the ancient ‘ letter numerals ’ and the later decimal notation. According to the second system, which is now commonly used throughout the civilized world, there are only ten figures, viz. those for the numbers one to nine and the zero. With the application of the principle of place value, these are sufficient for the writing of any number in the simplest way possible. According to the older system, separate symbols were employed for the numbers one to nine, for ten and its multiples upto hundred and for the multiples of 100 upto 1000. Still higher numbers were also written according to the same principle. This old system was followed in Indian inscriptions exclusively upto 594-95 A.D., the date of the Sankheda-Mankani inscription wherein the use of the new system is noticed for the first time,[2] although Varāhamihira’s Pañchasiddhāntikā (sixth century A.D.) and the Puliśasiddhānta, referred to by him and quoted by Utpala (tenth century), suggest that the system was known to astronomers at least about the close of the fifth century.[3] From this time upto the end of the tenth century,[4] the two systems are found to be used side by side in Indian inscriptions, the old style being discontinued thereafter.

>

But the old system appears exclusively in the Bower manuscripts and in the manuscripts from Kashagarh, as well as, together with the decimal system, in the old Jain manuscripts from Western India and in the Buddhist manuscripts from Nepal as late as the sixteenth century and in the Tamil and Malayalam manuscripts upto the present time.[5] We know that, according to the new system, fractions were written, at least in the manuscripts of mathematical works, practically in the modern fashion. We also know that the system of writing fractions by symbols is followed in the medieval and modern records of South India[6] and that another system of writing them with the help of vertical and slanting daṇḍas is prevalent in many parts of India,[7] although both these systems are imperfect. But very little is known as to how the fractions would have been written when the decimal system of writing numbers had not developed. It is usually believed that ‘ from very early times (c. 200 A.D.) the Hindus wrote fractions just as we do now, but without the dividing line ’.[8] Here is no doubt a reference to the system followed in mathematical manuscripts. In the Bakhsali manuscripts,[9] the earliest mathematical manuscripts in the Indian alphabet, 2½ is indicated by placing 2, 1 and 2 vertically as 2 and ‘ fractions and groups of fractions are placed in

1

2

____________________________________________________

[1] Ed. Datta, pp. 212 ff.
[2] See p. 164, note 2 above.
[3] G. H. Ojha, The Palaeography of India (in Hindi), 1918, pp. 115-16. For the evidence of the Bakhsali manuscript, see infra.
[4] Ibid., p. 115. But we now know that the old system was used in Orissa inscriptions as late as the second quarter of the eleventh century A.D. Cf. IHQ, Vol. XXIX, p. 151.
[5] Cf. Ind. Ant., Vol. XXXIII, Appendix, pp. 77 ff.
[6] See Burnell, Elements of South Indian Palaeography, 1878, Pl. XXXIII, A.H. Arden A Progressive Grammar of Common Tamil, 1930, p. 62.
[7] The use of this system prevalent in Bengal and many other parts of Northern and Southern India, is noticed in certain East Indian inscriptions of the thirteen century. See N. G. Majumdar, Inscriptions of Bengal, Vol. III, pp. 146 ff., above Vol. XXVII, p. 182 ff., Vol. XXX, pp. 51 ff. The principle was based on the division of one into quarters and sixteenth expressed respectively by vertical and slanting daṇḍas. These original forms have undergone slight changes in some modern Indian scripts. It has to be noticed that all fractions cannot be written according to this system.
[8] Datta and Singh, op. cit., p. 188.
[9] Ed. G. R. Kaye, Parts I-II, p. 23.

Home Page

>
>