|
South Indian Inscriptions |
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA Khawās Khān had taken refuge in the hills of Kumāūn, Islām Shāh is stated to have recorded a solemn oath that he had forgiven all his past offences and begged him to attend at court and proceed against the Rāṇā of Udaypur who had again raised his head, plundered several of the royal possessions and carried off the wives and daughters of Muslims, although at the same time orders were sent to the governor of Sambhal to put the general to death as soon as he should come within reach.[1] This event took place in A.H. 959 corresponding to 1551 A.D. according to some authoritirs.[2] Rāṇā Udayasiṁha thus seems to have thrown off his allegiance to the Sūrs before the date of Khawās Khān’s murder.[3]The reference to the Sūr territory, which was plundered by the Rāṇā and whence Muslim women were carried away, seems to point to the reoccupation of Chitor by Udayasiṁha. Tod is silent in regard to the date of the recovery of the Jodhpur region by Māladeva from the Afghans.[4] But B.N. Reu has quoted the following facts : Sher Shāh occupied the Jodhpur region of Mārwār in 1544 A.D. and left Khawār Khān at Jodhpur as his viceroy ; the Sūr occupation of parts of Mārwār lasted only for about one year and a half ; Māladēva (1532-62 A.D.) drove out the Afghans from Jodhpur before the end of V.S. 1603 (1546 A.D.).[5] Unfortunately no authority has been cited in support of the last statement. Whether Rāṇā Udayasiṁha helped the Rāṭhors in ousting the Afghans from Jodhpur cannot be determined, although that is not improbable. But the Rāṇā does not appear to have continued his allegiance to the Sūrs for any considerable length of time after the expulsion of the Afghans from Mārwār. This seems to be suggested by the prominent mention of the Rāṇā’s aggression in Islām Shāh’s communication to Khawās Khān, which does not mention Māladeva, often described by Muslim authors as the most powerful ruler in Rājputānā. Thus the date of Rāṭhor success against the Sūrs may actually be little later than that suggested by Reu. Reference has been made by Reu to the existence of Khawās Khān’s tomb (now called Khāsgā Pīr’s Dargah) at Jodhpur. This may suggest that Jodhpur was under Muslim occupation till the time of Khawās Khān’s death.
Another very interesting fact disclosed by the inscription under review is the inclusion of at least parts of the present Jaipur District within the dominions of the Rāṇās of Mewār.[6] Cunningham sketched the history of Toḍā-Rāising on the basis of Rājput traditions which, however, have nothing to say on this particular point.[7] This no doubt shows that these traditions are not quite trustworthy as a source of history. There is also no mention of the chief Rāmachandra ___________________________________________________
[1] Camb. Hist. Ind., op. cit., p. 59 ; Roy, op. cit., p. 33 ; Elliot and Dowson, op. cit., p. 531.
|
> |
>
|