The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

40 Seers or about 82 pounds) of rice, possibly per day, to the deity with the cognizance of Mahādēva Pāṭhin known from Nos. 1 and 3. The grant was made with clarified butter, curds, curry and betel-leaf as in the other cases analysed above. The other piece of land measured 10 Māṇas (i.e. ½ Vāṭi) and was apparently situated in the same locality and dedicated to the same god. It is stated to have been granted for making provision for the supply of ten bundles (? halā) of fragrant flowers probably per day. This grant was made with the cognizance of a person called Kalūā-mālaṇī.

The dates of the inscriptions under discussion raise certain interesting questions, the first of which relates to the initial year of the reign of Anaṅgabhīma III. The late Mr. M. Chakravarti believed that the said Gaṅga king ascended the throne in Śaka 1133 (1211-12 A.D.)[1] and this suggestion has been generally accepted by scholars.[2] Our inscriptions, however, show that a date in his 13th regnal year (15th Aṅka) fell in Śaka 1147 (1225-26 A.D.), while the end of the 24th (29th Aṅka) and the beginning of the 25th (31st Aṅka) year of his reign fell in the month of Kumbha or Phālguna in Śaka 1158 (1236-37 A.D.). This fact would suggest that Anṅgabhīma III ascended the throne not in Śaka 1133 but in the month of Phālguna in Śaka 1134, that is to say, about the beginning of 1213 A.D. Inscription No. 3 is dated in Śaka 1158, Kumbha-sudi 6, corresponding to February 3, 1237 A.D. This date fell in the king’s 29th Aṅka or 24th regnal year, while Inscription No. 4, is dated is Śaka 1158, Phālguna (Kumbha)-badi 1 corresponding to February 12, 1237 A.D. and falling in his 31st Aṅka or 25th regnal year. This the end of the 24th and the beginning of the 25th regnal year of Gaṅga Anaṅgabhīma III fell on a date between the 3rd and 12th February, 1237 A.D. His accession or the beginning of his first regnal year therefore fell on a date in the corresponding period of 1213 A.D. It may be recalled in this connection that a Bhubaneswar inscription of Narasiṁha I, son and successor of Anaṅgabhīma III, is dated in Śaka 1165 and in the Aṅka year 5 (i.e. the 4th regnal year) of that king’s reign and that this suggests a later date than the one proposed by Chakravarti for this prince’s accession.[3] It has, however, to be admitted that, among other known records of the time of Anaṅgabhīma III, some[4] would support the evidence of the inscriptions under study while some others[5] would suggest a slightly earlier date for his accession. Similarly there is no uniformity in the epigraphic evidence relating to the date of the accession of Narasiṁha I.[6] Much of this discrepancy is no doubt due to the mistakes committed by the scribes responsible for the epigraphs.[7]

>

According to Chakravarti, the characteristics of the Aṅka system of regnal reckoning are the following : (1) 1 and all figures ending in 0 (except 10) and 6 should be omitted ; (2) the last Aṅka of one king and the second Aṅka (i.e. regnal year 1) of the succeeding king fall in the same year ; and (3) the year begins on the day of Suniyā, Siṁha (Bhādrapada) śukla-dvādaśī.[8] Inscriptions

_______________________________________________

[1] JASB, 1903, p. 118.
[2] JAHRS, Vol. VII, p. 233.
[3] Ind. Cult., Vol. III, p. 121. But this discrepancy may possibly be rectified if the Śaka year is regarded as current (see IHQ, Vol. XXXI, pp. 81 ff.).
[4] See SII, Vol. V, No. 1290 equating his 22nd Aṅka or 18th regnal year (Siṁha-sudi 7, Friday) with Śaka 1152.
[5] Ibid., No. 1282 dated Śaka 1139 and the 9th Aṅka or 7th regnal year, and No. 1318 dated Śaka 1147 and the 17th Aṅka or 14th regnal year (Mithuna-sudi 11, Wednesday).
[6] Cf. ibid., No. 1261 dated Śaka 1176 (not 1179 as printed)=19th Aṅka or 16th regnal year (Tulā-saṁkrānti, badi 1, Monday), and No. 1265 dated 1179 (not 1129 as printed)=24th Aṅka or 20th regnal year (Tulā-sudi 3, Tuesday) which appear to suggest that Narasiṁha I ascended the throne in the month of Tulā in Śaka 1161 (October, 1239 A.D). But some inscriptions point to a date several months earlier. Cf. No. 1272 dated Śaka 1163=4th Aṅka or 3rd regnal year (Ṛishabha-sudi 13, Thursday), No. 1305 dated Śaka 1167=10th Aṅka or 8th regnal year (Mīna-sudi 6, Friday), etc.
[7] Cf. IHQ, Vol. XXVIII, pp. 342 ff., for the responsibility of astrologers.
[8] JASB, 1903, p. 100.

Home Page

>
>