The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

inscription closely resembles other epigraphs of the area and period in question. The record bears no date ; but, as will be shown below, there is reason to assign it to a date in the eleventh century.

The inscription under discussion originally contained at least twenty-three stanzas in the Anushṭubh metre. They are all addressed to the Sun-god and the last of them speaks of the composition as a stuti (eulogy). Out of these, the text of ten stanzas (verses 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 18, 20, 22) only have been fully deciphered, although there is some doubt about the reading of a few letters in one (verse 17) of them. Of the remaining thirteen stanzas, two (verses 1-2 in line 1) are completely lost, while the other eleven (verses 3-5, 7, 10, 12, 14, 16, 19, 21, 23) are partially preserved. The meaning of some of the damaged verses is not clear.

Verse 5 refers to the sage Agastya who is famous in the solar mythology of India not only as the son of Mitra (the Sun-god) and Varuṇa but also as one who prevented Vindhya (the Vindhyan range) from his attempt to obstruct the sun’s passage in the sky. Verse 6 says how the Sun-god’s youngest brother (i.e. Vishṇu, the youngest of the twelve Ādityas including the Sun-god, according to some accounts[1]) cut off the head of Rāhu, although the demon’s life was spared as a result of his entreaty. Verse 8 represents the sun’s rays as the source of the splendour of such objects as the jewel on the hood of Śēsha-nāga, the pearls in the bed of the sea and the stars in the sky. The next stanza (verse 9) says that the sun’s rays, when they come into contact with the moon, the horizon and the clouds, become respectively the moonlight, the twilight and the rainbow. In regard to the idea that the moonlight is nothing but the sun’s rays reflected on the moon, it may be pointed out that it was fairly popular with ancient Indian writers.[2] The ancient Indian conception about this is made quite clear by Mallinātha in his commentary on the Raghuvaṁśa, III, 22 ; atra Varāha-saṁhitā-vachanaṁ salilamayē śaśini ravēr=dīdhitayō mūrchchhitās=tamō naiśaṁ kshapayanti darpaṇ=ōdara-nihitā iva mandirasy=āntar ’=iti ; yathā darpaṇ-ōdara-nihitā ravidīdhitayas=tad-gatam=andhakāraṁ nāśayanti tathā svataḥ salilamayē chandrē tāḥ pratiphalitā naiśaṁ tamō ghnant=īty=arthaḥ. The other idea, reflected in the verse in question, that the rainbow is produced by the sun’s rays falling on the dripping clouds is also very interesting. Although it is supported by modern scientific observation, it does not, however, appear to have been quite popular with ancient Indian writers.

>

Verse 11 illustrates the maxim prēmṇō hi kuṭilā gatiḥ (love’s way is tortuous) by pointing out how Svarbhānu (i.e. Rāhu) prefers the moon to the sun in spite of the latter having his own name (Bhānu) and how the sun hides himself from the lotus (at night) in spite of the latter’s attachment for him. Verses 18 and 20 are remarkable for their pleasant idea and sweet expression and are really worthy of a great poet.) Verse 23 refers to the conclusion of the eulogy. Then follow references in prose to the author of the said eulogy, the person who was responsible for tracing the inscription on the stone and the devotee of the Sun-god who got the stone inscribed and apparently embedded it in a wall of the temple of the deity at Bhīlsā. The eulogy is stated to have been the composition of the Mahākavichakravartin Paṇḍita śrī-Chhittapa. The name of the lēkhaka who traced the writing on the stone with a view to facilitating the work of the engraver cannot unfortunately be made out. The person who got the eulogy written and the stone inscribed for embedding it in a wall of the Sun-god’s temple was Daṇḍanāyaka śrī-Chandra. We have seen above how a Daṇḍa (Daṇḍanāyaka) was probably in charge of a sub-division of the Bhāillasvāmin (Bhīlsā)

____________________________________________________

[1] See Māhābhārata I, 123, 66-67, XIII, 150, 14-15 ; Harivaṁśa, I, 9, 48 ; Bhāgavata Purāṇa, VI, 6, 39 ; etc.
[2] Cf. Raghuvaṁśa, III, 22 ; Hayungthal plate (lines 24-25) of king Harjaravarman of Assam (Kāmarāpaśāsanāvalī, p. 51) ; etc. Prof. P. C. Sen Gupta points out to me that the same idea can be traced in ancient Indian astronomical works such as Varāhamihira quoted in Pṛithūdaka’s commentary on Brahmagupra’s Khaṇḍakhādyaka (Chapter VIII), the Sūryasiddhānta quoted in the commentary of Utpala (966 A.D.) on Varāhamibira’s Bṛihatsaṁhitā., etc.

Home Page

>
>