The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

district according to an inscription of 1173 A.D. Chandra of the inscription under study appears to have been a similar Sub-divisional Officer of the Bhīlsā region. He was apparently a devotee of the Sun-god of Bhīlsā and got a eulogy of the deity composed by the poet Chhittapa who may have been an inhabitant of the same area.

The inscription ends with the akshara chha placed between double daṇḍas. This chha is really one of the many variants of the Siddham symbol.[1] While at the beginning of records the symbol appears in several forms (variations of a sign resembling the modern Oriya 1 or 2 as reproduced in Ojha’s Prāchīnalipimālā, Plate LXXIX, with the occasional addition, in the former variety, of a cipher below or at the right), at their end it is usually found in the form of chha or tha or a symbol standing midway between the forms of these two aksharas.[2]

The importance of the inscription lies in the mention of the poet Chhittapa, who enjoyed the title Mahākavichakravartin, as the author of the khaṇḍakāvya in praise of the Sun-god, quoted in the record.

A number of stanzas of a poet named Chhittapa are found in the Sanskrit anthologies and some other works. But no complete work of the poet has so far been discovered. The pratīkas of all the stanzas attributed to Chhittapa have been quoted in alphabetical order by F. W. Thomas in the excellent introduction of his edition of the Kavīndravachanasamuchchaya.[3] Unfortunately there was a confusion about the poet’s name which is sometimes quoted also as Chittapa, Chhittipa, Chhinnama and Chhitrama. Moreover stanzas attributed to this poet in some sources are assigned in others to ‘ an unknown author ’ (kasy=āpi) or to various authors such as Siṁhadatta, Navakara, Dakshiṇātya, Akālajalada and Hanumat or to such works as the Bhōjaprabhandha. Six stanzas of Chhittapa are quoted in the Sarasvatīkaṇṭhābharaṇa of the Paramāra king Bhōja (circa 1010-55 A.D.), one in the Kavīndravachanasamuchchaya compiled before the end of the twelfth century, and forty-nine in the Saduktikarṇāmṛita compiled by Śrīdharadāsa at the court of king Lakshmaṇa sēna of Bengal in 1205-06 A.D. Poet Chhittapa therefore could not have flourished much later than the middle of the eleventh century. The following stanza of the poet, quoted in the Saduktikarṇāmṛita (III, 36), throws further light on his age :

>

Vālamīkēḥ katamō=si kas=tvam=athavā Vyāsasya yēn=aisha bhōḥ ślāghyaḥ syāt=tava Bhōja-bhūpati-bhuja-stambha-stutāv=udyamaḥ |

paṅguḥ parvatam=ārurukshasi-vidhu-sparśaṁ karēṇ=ēhasē dōrbhyāṁ sāgaram=uttitīrshasi yadi brūmaḥ kim=atr=ōttaram ||

This shows that Chhittapa was a contemporary and probably a court poet of a king named Bhōja who has been identified with the celebrated Paramāra monarch of that name. Thomas rightly says, “ The rather numerous citations in the Sarasvatīkaṇṭhābharaṇa are, therefore, by a contemporary”. His ascription of Chhittapa to the tenth century is, however, apparently due to oversight, as the poet must have flourished in the eleventh century when his contemporary and patron, Paramāra Bhōja, ruled. The title of Mahākavichakravartin may have been conferred on Paṇḍita Chhittapa by the same king. Possibly Chhittapa was an eminent poet at Bhōja’s court. The Bhīlsā region is known to have formed a part of the dominions of the Paramāras. Chhittapa’s friend, Daṇḍanayaka Chandra, therefore seems to have been an officer in the employment of Paramāra Bhōja.

_____________________________________________________

[1] Cf. above. Vol. XVII, p. 352 ; Proc. IHC, 1939, pp. 471 ff.
[2] For chha see above, Vol. XXIII, pp. 140-1 (text, lines 4 and 15), Vol. XXV, p. 63 (text, line 94), p. 221 (text, line 141) ; etc. See also Naishadhīya, XVI, 98 (cf. Journ. Or. Inst., Baroda, Vol. III, No. 4, June 1954, p. 368) ; Hēmachandra’s Ēkāksharakōśa, v. 13 ; Śāśvatakōśa, Poona, 1930, p. 74. For tha, see above, Vol. XXIII, p. 298 (text, line 30), Vol. XIX, p. 81 (text, line 41). For the intermediate sign, see ibid., Vol. XXIII, p. 80 (text, line 38). Consult the Plates in all the cases. The mark is sometimes found at the end of a stanza or section of a record.
[3] Published by the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Calcutta, 1912, pp. 37-40.

Home Page

>
>