South Indian Inscriptions

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

19 ṇ-ōtpatti[ka*]-cha-ṭī 1 vyā^[1]-bhū2/16 ^[2](⅛) sāṁ-hi 5 [|*] tathā Vrā(Brā)^[3]-śrī-Sudōkasya cha-ṭī 1 vyā[1]-bhū 3/16 sāṁ-hi 8 [|*] ta-

20 thā Vrā(Brā)-[śrī*]-Kālēmīkasya^[4] ṭī 1 vyā^[1]-bhū 2/16(⅛) sāṁ-hi 4 [|*] Vrā(Brā)-[śrī*]-Tārā- patēḥ cha-ṭī 1 vyā^[1]-bhū 2/16+1/64(9/64) sāṁ-hi 42/4 (4½)^[5] [|*] Bharadvā-

21 ja-sagōtra-paṁ-śrī-Pāṇḍōkasya^[6] gṛi-ṭī 1 vyā[1]-bhū 3/16+1/64 (13/64) sāṁ-hi 102/16 (10⅛) [|*] tathā Vrā(Brā)-śrī-Dēukasya[7] gṛiha-ṭī 1 vyā^[1]-bhū 2/16+1/64 (9/64)

22 sāṁ-hi 4 [|*] tathā Vrā(Brā)-śrī-Sudōkasya gṛiha-ṭī 1 vyā[1]-bhū ¼ sāṁ-hi 87/16 [|*] Kāṇṭā- maṇīya^[8]-Vrā(Brā)-śrī-Kēśavasya gṛi- 23 ṭī 1 vyā[1]-bhū 2/16(⅛) sāṁ-hi 414/16(4⅞) [|*] tath=āsya mu-ṭī 1 vyā[1]-bhū 1/16+1/64(5/64) sāṁ-hi 9/16 [|*] tathā Vrā(Brā)-śrī-Vra(Bra)hmōkasya^[9] gṛi-

24 ṭī 1 vyā[1]-bhū 3/16 sāṁ-hi 2 [|*] ēda(vaṁ) tath=āsya mu-ṭī 1 [|*] vyā[1]-bhū 2/16(⅛) sāṁ-hi [1¼] [|*] [ta]^[10]th=āsya nā-bhū ½^[11] sāṁ-hi 2 [|*]

25 tathā sya(cha) Vrā(Brā)^[3]-śrī-Sirōkasya gṛiha-ṭī 1 vyā^[1]-bhū 2/16+1/64 (9/64) sāṁ-hi 5¾ [|*] Pūrvagrāmīya-Vrā(Brā)^[3]-śrī-Dharaṇikasya Guṇō-

26 mbh-ārddha-cha-tī 1 vyā^[1]-bhū 1/16+2/64(3/32) sāṁ-hi 22/4 (2½) [|*] Sidhalagrāmīya^[12]-paṁ-śrī- Pāukasya^[13] cha-ṭī 1 vyā^[1]-bhū ¼ sāṁ-hi 4 [|*] Ātrē-

27 ya-[sa*]gōtra-Vrā(Brā)^[3]-śrī-Śāṅkōkasya nā-bhū ¼ sāṁ-hi 1¼ [|*] Diṇḍisāyīya-Vrā(Brā)^[3]- śrī-Prajāpatēḥ gṛiha-vāṭyāṁ

28 bhū 1/16 sāṁ-hi 3¼ [|*] gṛihi-paṁ-śrī-Nāthōkasya nā-bhū 5/16 sāṁ-hi 1¼ Vrā(Brā)^[3]-śrī- Jalökasya^[14] grā-hi 12/16 (1⅛) [|*] Vrā(Brā)^[3]-śrī-

29 Viśvarūpasya gṛi-ṭī 1[15] vyā[1]-bhū 2/16+1/64(9/64) sāṁ-hi 36/16 (3⅜) [|*] Vrā(Brā)^[3]-śrī-Mādhōkasya Chi^[16]-khi-mu-ṭī 1^[17] vyā^[1]-bhū ¼ [|*] Kēśara-

_____________________________________________

^[1] The editors read byā.
^[2] The editors read 7. The symbol, however, stands midway between the form of ⅛ written with two slanting daṇḍas and its modification now used in Bengal.
^[3] The editors read brā.
^[4] The editors’ transcript has Kālēmikasya.
^[5] This has been omitted in the editors’ transcript ; but in their translation it is given as ‘ 3/16 purāṇas (sic.)’.
^[6] The editors, transcript has Paṇḍōkasya.
^[7] The editors read Dēḍakasya. But note the resemblance of the initial u in this word with the same letter in uparilikhita in line 17 and its difference from ḍ in Kāpaḍīka in the same line.
^[8] The editors read Kāṇyāmalīya.
^[9] The editors read Braº.
^[10] The amount and the akshara ta are broken away ; but, adding the other amounts and comparing the result with the total given in line 32, the lost amount can be confidently restored. The editors say, “ As the total of the yearly income from different lands falls short by 1 purāṇa from the total given in line 32, we may take the income of Brahmōka’s land as 1 purāṇa yearly ”. This is due to a mistake in their calculation.
^[11] The editors’ transcript has ⅛ at this place.
^[12] The editors’ transcript has Si(d)dhalagrāmīya.
^[13] The editors read Pā(ṁ)ḍukasya and observe, “ The name does not seem to be Pāūka ”. The initial u employed here closely resembles the same akshara as found in uparilikhita in line 17. Cf. Kāmarūpaśasanāvaḷī, p. 161, n. 3.
^[14] The editors read Janö(lō)kasya. But compare l in this word with the same letter in līlā in line 12.
^[15] The editors read 2.
^[16] The editors read bi.
^[17] The editors read 3.