The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

A. S. Altekar

P. Banerjee

Late Dr. N. K. Bhattasali

Late Dr. N. P. Chakravarti

B. CH. Chhabra

A. H. Dani

P. B. Desai

M. G. Dikshit

R. N. Gurav

S. L. Katare

V. V., Mirashi

K. V. Subrahmanya Aiyar

R. Subrahmanyam

T. N. Subramaniam and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri

M. Venkataramayya

Akshaya Keerty Vyas

D. C. Sircar

H. K. Narasimhaswami

Sant Lal Katare

Index

Appendix

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

eulogy is all about the Early Gaṅgas, and the donor, Mahārāja Indravarman, is said to be the establisher of the spotless Gaṅga family, the years may be taken to be of the Gaṅga era till such time as the contrary is proved.

The date of the inscription is given in words as Śatē triṁśaty-adhikē and then in numerical symbols as saṁvatsarāḥ 100 30 3. The last number ‘three’ is represented by three horizontal strokes one over the other, but between the symbols representing 30 and 3 another horizontal stroke, though shorter in size, is also noticeable. After the date in numerical symbols comes the term Śrāvaṇa-māsa. It is possible to interpret the year as 133 if the numerical symbols are taken into account. Then the expression Śatē triṁśaty-adhikē should be changed to Śate trayas-triṁśatyadhikē. The omission of trayas before triṁśat may be, as suggested by Dr. B. Ch. Chhabra, a case of haplography due to the carelessness of the engraver.

Notwithstanding the investigations of a host scholars, the latest of them being Prof. Mirashi, the starting point of the Gaṅga era is still a riddle awaiting a satisfactory solution. Dr. Fleet[1] who tried to arrange the Gaṅga genealogy and fix the starting point of the era by basing his arguments on the synchronism afforded by the Gōdāvarī grant of Pṛithivīmūla, gave it up as the identification of Indrabhaṭṭāraka with Indrabhaṭṭāraka of the Chālukya dynasty did not stand scrutiny. On the other hand, Mr. G. Ramadas[2] basing on the astronomical details supplied by the grants themselves fixed 349 A. C. as the initial year of the Gaṅga Era ; but this was questioned by Mr. R. Subbarao[3] who, following the line of argument of Fleet, identified Indrabhaṭṭāraka of the Gōdāvarī grant of Pṛithivīmūla with Indrabhaṭṭārakavarman of the Vishṇukuṇḍin family and fixed the date of commencement of the Gaṅga era to be some time between 492 and 496 A.C.

t>

This was disputed by Mr. Somasekhara Sarma[4], as the chronology of the Vishṇukuṇḍins itself has not been satisfactorily fixed, and as there was no agreement among scholars in the arrangement of the pedigrees furnished by the copper plate records of the rulers of the Vishṇukuṇḍin family. After an exhaustive discussion with the help of astronomical details supplied by the grants Mr. Somasekhara Sarma surmised that the Pūrṇimānta system of reckoning was followed during the rule of the early Gaṅgas and that the “Epoch of the Gaṅga Era began in the Śaka year 426-7 or 504-5 A.C. between June and January of that year”. Prof. Mirashi of Nagpur, after detailed examination of the Gaṅga dates showed that the “Gaṅga Era commenced on amānta Chaitra śu. di. 1 in the Śaka year 420 (the 14th March A.D. 498).[5] In his note on the Ponnuturu plates of Gaṅga Sāmantavarman[6] he also suggested that though the Pūrṅimānta scheme has been used in two of the earlier grants of the Gaṅga Era, the Amānta scheme has been adopted in later grants. If the surmise that the discrepancy in the numerical symbols employed in the present record is a scribal error and the suggested correction be accepted, then the grant was made in the year 133. It should be taken as the current year. The grant is said to have been made on the occasion of a solar eclipse on the new moon day of Śrāvaṇa. Calcluating from the starting point fixed by Prof. Mirashi, i.e., Śaka 420 plus 132 expired years of the era, we get Ś. 552 (630 A. C.) as the date of the grant. According to Swamikannu Pillai’s Indian Ephemeris, on the 13th of August of that year there was a solar eclipse ; but this was in the month of Bhādrapada.

The village Tōṭavāṭaka is said to have been situated in the Krōshṭukavartanī vishaya. Krōshṭukavartanī appears in many of the early Gaṅga plates as the name of a territorial division and has been identified with the area round about the Narasannapeta taluk in the Srikakulam

_________________________________________________

[1] Ind. Ant., Vol. XVI, pp. 131 ff.
[2] JBORS, Vol. IX, pp. 398 ff.
[3] JAHRS, Vol. II, pp. 146 ff.
[4] Ibid., Vol. V, p. 171 ff. and Ind. Cult., Vol. IX, No. 1, pp. 141 ff.
[5] Above, Vol. XXVII, p. 192.
[6] Ibid., Vol. XXVIII, pp. 171 ff.

Home Page