South Indian Inscriptions

Contents
Index
Introduction
Contents
List of Plates
Additions and Corrections
Images
Authors
Contents
D. R. Bhat
P. B. Desai
Krishna Deva
G. S. Gai
B R. Gopal & Shrinivas Ritti
V. B. Kolte
D. G. Koparkar
K. G. Krishnan
H. K. Narasimhaswami & K. G. Krishana
K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam
Sadhu Ram
S. Sankaranarayanan
P. Seshadri Sastri
M. Somasekhara Sarma
D. C. Sircar
D. C. Sircar & K. G. Krishnan
D. C. Sircar & P. Seshadri Sastri
K. D. Swaminathan
N. Venkataramanayya & M. Somasekhara Sarma
Index
Other South-Indian Inscriptions
Volume 1	Volume 2
Volume 3	Vol. 4 - 8
Volume 9	Volume 10
Volume 11	Volume 12
Volume 13	Volume 14
Volume 15	Volume 16
Volume 17	Volume 18
Volume 19	Volume 20
Volume 22 Part 1	Volume 22 Part 2
Volume 23	Volume 24
Volume 26	Volume 27
Tiruvarur	Darasuram
Konerirajapuram	Tanjavur
Annual Reports 1935-1944	Annual Reports 1945- 1947
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2	Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1	Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
Epigraphica Indica	Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4	Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7	Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27	Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30	Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32	Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2	Vākāṭakas Volume 5
Early Gupta Inscriptions
Archaeological Links
Archaeological-Survey of India
Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

________________________________________________

^[1] The subjects of king Rāja adored him so much that they longed for a [continued] stay on this earth only [and not for liberation]. There is Atiśayōkti. [There are Rūpaka and Virōdhābhāsa.─ Ed.] Read samara=abhaº.
^[3] There is Upamā. The splendour of the enemy kings is compared to the shadow of trees. Pratāpa-taraṇi is to be explained as pratāpaḥ taraṇiḥ iva or pratāpaḥ taraṇiḥ ēva or pratāp-yuktaḥ taraṇiḥ. The third foot gives Chhēkānuprāsa due to the repetition of t, r and ṇ. [Pratāpa-taraṇi exhibits Rūpaka only.─Ed.]
^[4]There is Yathāsaṅkhya as well as Kriyādīpaka as all the three nouns, vasumatī-maṇḍala (which is the matter on hand), bhānu-bimba and śailēndra-sandhi are connected with the same verb saṁvṛiyantē.
^[5] We may suggest Bhillammaº for the sake of the metre.
^[6] Bhillama is here likened to Agastya. The points of resemblances are brought out by double-meaning expressions.
^[7]The verse implicitly suggesting the superiority of Bhillama over Agastya exhibits Vyatirēka-dhvani.
^[8]The daṇḍa is unnecessary.

Page 9 - >>

<< - 7 Page

Home Page