The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Authors

Contents

D. R. Bhat

P. B. Desai

Krishna Deva

G. S. Gai

B R. Gopal & Shrinivas Ritti

V. B. Kolte

D. G. Koparkar

K. G. Krishnan

H. K. Narasimhaswami & K. G. Krishana

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam

Sadhu Ram

S. Sankaranarayanan

P. Seshadri Sastri

M. Somasekhara Sarma

D. C. Sircar

D. C. Sircar & K. G. Krishnan

D. C. Sircar & P. Seshadri Sastri

K. D. Swaminathan

N. Venkataramanayya & M. Somasekhara Sarma

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

was that brother whom subsequently Vikramāditya VI set up to rule over Vēṅgī. It is quite likely that this prince was set up to rule over Vēṅgī during the last days of Vikramāditya VI, presumably to continue the hold of the Western Chālukya ruler over the area permanently and to prevent the return of the country to the Imperial Chōḷas.

Thus at the time of Vikrama-chōḷa’s accession to the throne, the Chōḷa empire had lost Gaṅgavāḍi in the west and Vēṅgī in the north. Probably such cession of territory to the Chālukya was the price which Vikrama-chōḷa had agreed to pay for the help rendered to him by Vishṇuvardhana and Vikramāditya VI in securing the Chōḷa throne. It is true that evidences are not quite clear and that some of the foregoing statements may not be capable of individual proof at present ; but there is nothing implausible in the surmises made, the correctness of which will have to be confirmed by further discoveries.

Our thanks are due to Dr. N. V. Venkataramanayya who helped us by drawing our attention to the Telugu records referred to in the discussion above.

t>

TEXT[1]

A

1 Svasti-Śrī [||*]Pūmaṅgai vaḷara Puvimaṅgai punara
2 Jayamaṅgai magula[2] Pugalmaṅgai ka[3]malara=ttann-a-
3 ḍiy-iraṇḍu[n*]=taraṇipar śūṭṭa(ḍa) pen-muḍiyodu[m]=mu[4] puga-
4 luḍan śūḍi=taṅ-gōn varavil[5] śeṅgōl na-
5 ḍātta(tti)[6] tiṅgaḷ-veṇ-kuḍai-kīl vijaiya-siṁ-
6 hāsanattu vīrrirundaruḷiya Kō-Pparakēsari-pa[n*]
7 marāna Tribhuvanachakkaravattigaḷ śrī-Parāntakadē-
8 va[r*]kku yāṇḍu 9-dāvadu Nittavinōda-vaḷanā-
9 ṭ[7] ṭṭu Nallū-nāṭṭu Rājakēsari-charu[p*]pēdimaṅ-
10 galattu T[i]ruchchēlūr Mahādēva[r*]kku Pāṇḍi-
11 kulāśani-vaḷanāṭṭu Kiḷiyūr-nāṭṭu [Kā]ḷi-
12 kuḍi=[k*] kuḍigaḷḷa(ḷā)na Araiyan [Ka*]ṇṇa[p*]pan[8][n=ā]-
13 na Irājakēsari Pērayanēn[9] amudu-
14 paḍikku nān koṇḍu-viṭṭa nilam=āvadu-[|*] Rā-
15 jakēsari-charu[p*]pēdimaṅgalattu Kalākala[ch*]-

__________________________________________________

[1] From the ink-impression.
[2] Read magila.
[3] This ka is redundant.
[4]Read pon-muḍi=yoḷiyiḍa. It is written correctly in B.
[5] Read marabil.
[6] The phrase tiśai varambāga has been omitted here. See B, line 2.
[7] The first is superfluous.
[8] The n following pa is superfluous.
[9] The reading appears to be Pōyanēn (i.e. Bhōjanēn) here as well as in line 28.─D.C.]S.]

Home Page