The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Authors

Contents

D. R. Bhat

P. B. Desai

Krishna Deva

G. S. Gai

B R. Gopal & Shrinivas Ritti

V. B. Kolte

D. G. Koparkar

K. G. Krishnan

H. K. Narasimhaswami & K. G. Krishana

K. A. Nilakanta Sastri & T. N. Subramaniam

Sadhu Ram

S. Sankaranarayanan

P. Seshadri Sastri

M. Somasekhara Sarma

D. C. Sircar

D. C. Sircar & K. G. Krishnan

D. C. Sircar & P. Seshadri Sastri

K. D. Swaminathan

N. Venkataramanayya & M. Somasekhara Sarma

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

Sugaunā, Kāmēśvara’s residence near modern Madhubani in the Darbhanga District. After a short time, Fīrūz Shāh gave Kāmēśvara’s throne to the latter’s son Bhōgīśvara.[1] According to some doubtful traditions, Bhōgīśvara ruled for 33 years and died in 1360 A.D.[2] Bhōgīśvara’s son and successor was Gaṇēśvara who, according to Vidyāpati’s Kīrtilatā, was defeated and killed by an enemy named Aslān, apparently a Musalmān, aided probably by certain members of the Ōinvār family. The date of this event is given in the work in a corrupt passage which may mean the 5th of the first (i.e. dark) half of Agrahāyana in La. Saṁ. 252 (1371 A.D.).[3] His eldest son Vīrasiṁha seems to have been ruling over a part of the country in La. Saṁ. 228 (1347 A.D.) when a manuscript of the Liṅgavārttika was copied in his territory.[4] That he was a ruler is also suggested by the title Mahārājādhirāja applied to him in the Kīrtilatā.[5] Sometime after Gaṇēśvara’s death, his son Kīrtisiṁha became king with the help of Ibrāhim Shāh Sharqī (1401-40 A.D.) of Jaunpur. The next king was Bhavasiṁha, a younger son of Kāmēśvara, and he was succeeded by his eldest son Dēvasiṁha Garuḍanārāyaṇa. Since a manuscript of Śrīdatta’s Ēkāgnidānapaddhati, composed at Dēvasiṁha’s request, was copied on Monday, Pausha-śudi 9, La. Saṁ. 299 (1418 A.D.), he seems to have ascended the throne before that date.[6] According to a poem ascribed to Vidyāpati, Dēvasiṁha died on Thursday, Chaitra-vadi 6, La. Saṁ, 293 corresponding to Śaka 1324 (1403 A.D.) which is supposed to be a mistake for Śaka 1334 (1413 A.D.).[7] As Śrīdhara’s Kāvyaprakāśavivēka was composed on Kārttika-vadi 10, La. Saṁ. 291 (1411 A.D.) when Dēvasiṁha’s son Śivasiṁha Rūpanārāyaṇa in stated to have been ruling over Tīrabhukti, the son seems to have been reigning jointly with the father as Yuvarāja (or at least over parts of the kingdom) and to have been a patron of Śrīdhara. Dēvasiṁha ruled from Dēvakulī about 2 miles to the north of Darbhanga while Śivasiṁha had his headquarters at Gajarathapura or Śivasiṁhapura about 5 miles to the south-east of Darbhanga. Three spurious copper-plate charters of king Śivasiṁha, recording the grant of the village of Bisapī in favour of the poet Vidyāpati, bear respectively the dates V.S. 1455, Śaka 1321, and La. Saṁ. 293 equated with V. S. 1455, Śaka 1321 and San 807, i.e. probably 1399 A.D.[8] Śivasiṁha is described by Vidyāpati as the ‘ lord of the Five Gauḍas ’ and as one who subdued the king or kings of Gauḍa. This vague and conventional claim may suggest that, unlike his predecessors who owed allegiance to the Muhammadans, Śivasiṁha ruled for sometime as an independent monarch. The result, however, was fatal and, according to tradition, Śivasiṁha was defeated by the Musalmāns and carried away to Delhi.[9] The same source suggests that, after the tragic end of Śivasiṁha’s reign, his queen Lakhimādēvī ruled for 12 years and was succeeded by Padmasiṁha who was the younger brother of Śivasiṁha (and ruled for 6 years according to one tradition)[10] and that Padmasiṁha’s queen Viśvāsadēvī ruled for 12 years after her husband’s

_______________________________________________

t>

[1] JASB, N. S., Vol. XI, 1915, p. 416.
[2] Thakur, op. cit., p. 297 ; JBRS, Vol. XL, p. 102.
[3] JASB, op. cit., p. 416 and note 2 ; JBORS, Vol. XIII, p. 297.
[4] Thakur, op. cit. p. 302.
[5] JASB, loc. cit. The same title was often enjoyed by the ministers of the Ōinvār rulers, e.g. Chaṇḍēśvara and Rāmadatta, probably because they were ruling over parts of the country as viceroys or enjoyed extensive jāgīrs together with regal titles.
[6] Ibid., pp. 417-18. Doubtful traditions assign Bhavasiṁha’s accession to 1348 A.D. and Dēvasiṁha’s to 1385 A.D. (Eggeling, op. cit., p. 875).
[7] Ibid., pp. 418-19 ; D. C. Sen, Baṅgabhāshā-ō-Sāhitya, 5th ed., pp. 216-17. Thakur (op. cit., p. 306) ascribes to M. M. Chakravarti the view that Dēvasiṁha ascended the throne in Śaka 1263 (1342 A.D.). But there is no such statement in Chakravarti’s article referred to above.
[8] Cf. Bhandarkar’s List, Nos. 736, 1126 and 1470. The date of Śivasiṁha’s accession is assigned by tradition to 1446 A.D. (An. Rep. A.S.I., 1913-14, p. 249 ; Eggeling, loc. cit.).
[9] Ind. Ant., Vol. XVIII, p. 58.
[10] JBRS, Vol. XI, p. 120.

Home Page